2019
DOI: 10.5334/labphon.150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inductive learning of locality relations in segmental phonology

Abstract: This paper reports on a series of artificial grammar learning experiments focused on locality relations in patterns of long-distance consonant agreement (harmony) and disagreement (dissimilation). Participants in experimental conditions were exposed to dependencies affecting stem-suffix pairs of liquids at either a short-range (transvocalic, CVCVLV-LV) or medium-range (beyond-transvocalic, CVLVCV-LV) distance. Two experiments used a poverty of stimulus paradigm, offering no information about the other distance… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An example of such a system would be strictly beyond-transvocalic dissimilation, where two segments dissimilate only when they are separated by at least a vowel and a consonant; no dissimilation occurs across just a vowel (i.e., transvocalic contexts). McMullin (2016) and McMullin & Hansson (2019) ran a series of artificial grammar learning experiments, finding that strictly beyond-transvocalic patterns of liquid harmony and dissimilation are not reliably acquired in an experimental setting. Even when given unambiguous training data, participants tended to either infer a more typical unbounded pattern or else not infer any pattern.…”
Section: Subsequential Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of such a system would be strictly beyond-transvocalic dissimilation, where two segments dissimilate only when they are separated by at least a vowel and a consonant; no dissimilation occurs across just a vowel (i.e., transvocalic contexts). McMullin (2016) and McMullin & Hansson (2019) ran a series of artificial grammar learning experiments, finding that strictly beyond-transvocalic patterns of liquid harmony and dissimilation are not reliably acquired in an experimental setting. Even when given unambiguous training data, participants tended to either infer a more typical unbounded pattern or else not infer any pattern.…”
Section: Subsequential Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linguistically, these refinements have garnered interest since the morphological and phonological typology correlates with these refinements, favouring the weakest subclasses in the subregular hierarchy. Experimental work also favours this characterization (Finley 2008;Lai 2015;McMullin and Hansson 2019). Our learning algorithms can be applied to model-theoretic treatments of other linguistic representations such as syntactic trees or autosegmental graphs, which opens a useful direction for future research.…”
Section: Regular and Subregular Patternsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…It is well-known that learning non-adjacent dependencies poses a particular challenge for language learning (Bonatti et al, 2005;Endress & Bonatti, 2007;Frost & Monaghan, 2016;Gomez, 2002;Gomez & Maye, 2005;Misyak et al, 2009;Misyak & Christiansen, 2007;Newport & Aslin, 2004). This is an issue both in terms of non-adjacent dependencies among words in sentences (Wilson et al, 2020), but also within words in phonological patterns like vowel and consonant harmony (Finley, 2011(Finley, , 2015McMullin & Hansson, 2014, 2019, morphological patterns like non-concatenative morphology (Drake, 2018;Fullwood, 2018;Fullwood & O'Donnell, 2013).…”
Section: Segmentation Of Root and Pattern Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%