2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.03.084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induction versus noninduction therapy in kidney transplantation: considering different PRA levels and different induction therapies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
14
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 4 summarizes the most relevant retrospective studies. One large analysis of 763 patients undergoing kidney transplantation during 1995 to 2001 found no cases of PTLD in any induction-treated patient, but only 213 individuals received induction and only 71 were given rATG [73]. Two other large retrospective analyses did not specifically consider rATG, but found no effect of ATG preparations in general [74,75] on the risk of PTLD.…”
Section: Retrospective Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4 summarizes the most relevant retrospective studies. One large analysis of 763 patients undergoing kidney transplantation during 1995 to 2001 found no cases of PTLD in any induction-treated patient, but only 213 individuals received induction and only 71 were given rATG [73]. Two other large retrospective analyses did not specifically consider rATG, but found no effect of ATG preparations in general [74,75] on the risk of PTLD.…”
Section: Retrospective Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients taking IL-2 receptor antagonists could expect their no-induction probability of acute rejection to be reduced by 28%, 26 and patients treated with muromonab CD3 and equine antithymocyte globulin could expect their no-induction probability to be reduced by 9%. [27][28][29] Calculated first-year, no-induction acute rejection probabilities for each regimen are presented in Table 2. The probability of acute rejection in year 2 after transplantation was assumed to be 2.86% 30 and was assumed to decline linearly to a probability of 0% over a 10-yr time horizon.…”
Section: Clinical Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antibody induction agents in renal transplantation are highly effective in reducing acute rejection (1) and ultimately in preserving allograft function (2). Use of induction agents has increased over recent years and by 2005, nearly 75% of renal transplants in the United States were performed with induction therapy compared with 39% utilization in 1998 (3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%