2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2023.102623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induction or spontaneous labor for pregnant patients on anticoagulants?

Lea Mauny,
Violaine Peyronnet,
Edith Peynaud-Debayle
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another important aspect concerns the management of labor in patients with hereditary thrombophilia. Controversies persist regarding the choice between inducing labor and awaiting spontaneous labor, as a long interval without anticoagulation is a thrombosis risk factor, while a short interval increases the risks of delivering without epidural analgesia or postpartum hemorrhage [50]. On the other hand, premature induction or induction without proper cervical ripening can lead to an increased rate of induction failure, number of misoprostol doses, longer time of induction, and higher cesarean section and episiotomy rate, as in obese and older women [51,52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important aspect concerns the management of labor in patients with hereditary thrombophilia. Controversies persist regarding the choice between inducing labor and awaiting spontaneous labor, as a long interval without anticoagulation is a thrombosis risk factor, while a short interval increases the risks of delivering without epidural analgesia or postpartum hemorrhage [50]. On the other hand, premature induction or induction without proper cervical ripening can lead to an increased rate of induction failure, number of misoprostol doses, longer time of induction, and higher cesarean section and episiotomy rate, as in obese and older women [51,52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%