1995
DOI: 10.1016/0006-2952(95)00085-e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induction of the c-myc but not the cH-ras promoter by platinum compounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous other markers were also identified as involved in platinum activity, with a marked difference between the group constituted of cisplatin and carboplatin and the one constituted of tetraplatin and oxaliplatin. For instance, the significant link that we observed between oxaliplatin sensitivity and c-MYC expression was rather unexpected, although platinum compounds have been shown to activate the c-MYC gene promoter (38). So, too, was the highly significant correlation between tetraplatin sensitivity and topoisomerase II expression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Numerous other markers were also identified as involved in platinum activity, with a marked difference between the group constituted of cisplatin and carboplatin and the one constituted of tetraplatin and oxaliplatin. For instance, the significant link that we observed between oxaliplatin sensitivity and c-MYC expression was rather unexpected, although platinum compounds have been shown to activate the c-MYC gene promoter (38). So, too, was the highly significant correlation between tetraplatin sensitivity and topoisomerase II expression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Lobaplatin (D-19466; 1, 2-diammino-methylcyclobutaneplatinum (II)-lactate) is a representative of the third-generation platinum compounds delivered as a diastereomeric mixture of S, S and R, R configurations of the carrier ligand, complex with DNA alkylating activity (Huang et al, 2013). It can obstruct the process of DNA replication and transcription by forming Pt-GG and Pt-AG intrachain cross-linking so as to interfere the running of tumor cell cycles (Eliopoulos et al, 1995). Compared with cisplatin, lobaplatin is considered to be less toxic, more soluble and stable in water and shows incomplete cross-resistance to cisplatin (McKeage et al, 2001;Deng et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we demonstrate that lobaplatin could inhibit prostate cancer in vitro and in vivo in part by suppressing both AR and ERG signaling pathways that are two major drivers of prostate cancer. Interestingly, although a previous study demonstrated that lobaplatin could induce c-MYC promoter activity [35], our study showed that lobaplatin downregulated c-MYC expression in multiple prostate cancer cell lines, which may be attributed to the fact that c-MYC is a downstream target of AR and ERG in prostate cancer setting [29,36]. Moreover, consistent with previous studies [37][38][39], our results also demonstrated that lobaplatin treatment dramatically elevated MDR1 expression, indicating that combination of lobaplatin and MDR1 specific inhibitor might achieve better outcomes for prostate cancer therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%