2010
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.02460-09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induction of Reactive Oxygen Species by Human T-Cell Leukemia Virus Type 1 Tax Correlates with DNA Damage and Expression of Cellular Senescence Marker

Abstract: Human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) Tax affects cellular genomic stability and senescence. As yet, the mechanism(s) for these events caused by Tax is incompletely understood. Here, we show that Tax expression in primary human cells induces reactive oxygen species (ROS), which elicits DNA damage and the expression of senescence marker. Treatment with a ROS scavenger or knockdown of Tax expression by small interfering RNA (siRNA) abrogated Tax-induced DNA damage and the expression of senescence marker. O… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

4
65
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(43 reference statements)
4
65
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As activation of this pathway causes a fraction of Tax-expressing cells to halt cell cycle, 36 our data strengthen the link between Tax-induced enforced proliferation and DNA-damaging activities leading to cell-cycle arrest. Recent studies also suggest that DNA damage and H2AX phosphorylation in Tax-expressing cells result from induction of reactive oxygen species 9 and/or sequestration of DDR-associated proteins in TSS. [41][42][43] It thus appears that several Tax activities contribute to DSB formation and DDR pathway engagement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As activation of this pathway causes a fraction of Tax-expressing cells to halt cell cycle, 36 our data strengthen the link between Tax-induced enforced proliferation and DNA-damaging activities leading to cell-cycle arrest. Recent studies also suggest that DNA damage and H2AX phosphorylation in Tax-expressing cells result from induction of reactive oxygen species 9 and/or sequestration of DDR-associated proteins in TSS. [41][42][43] It thus appears that several Tax activities contribute to DSB formation and DDR pathway engagement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 Recent data also support a direct role for Tax-induced reactive oxygen species in the occurrence of DNA lesions. 9 Conceptually, Tax activities are achieved through proteinprotein interactions in both nuclear and cytoplasmic cellular compartments. 10 In the nucleus, Tax accumulates within foci called Tax speckled structures (TSS), 11 which overlap with the cellular machinery required for transcription, splicing, post-transcriptional modifications of proteins, DNA repair, and checkpoint control.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…within the host, but also subverts host cell DNA damage response mechanisms, cell cycle progression, and the apoptotic pathway (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, there are no studies describing a role of exosomes in HTLV-1 infection. It has been shown that soluble Tax can be taken up by recipient cells, whereas soluble Tax treatment of uninfected cells induces TNF-␣ gene expression and enhances the proliferation of phytohemagglutinin (PHA)-stimulated peripheral blood lymphocytes (18,53). Tax has been detected in the cerebrospinal fluid of HTLV-1-infected patients, in HAM/ TSP patients (54).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blockade of transcription initiation and formation of SGs are known to belong to the complex cellular stress response that is triggered by DNA damage (Pothof et al, 2009a, b). Tax was recently shown to induce reactive oxygen species, change in the intracellular redox status and DNA damage through activation of both CREB and NF-kB (Kinjo et al, 2010). The M22 mutant (intact for CREB but defective for NF-kB activity) and the M47 mutant (intact for NF-kB but defective for CREB activity) used in this study retain their ability to induce the formation of SGs when expressed in the nucleus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%