2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2008.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic Fibroblasts by Oct4 and Klf4 with Small-Molecule Compounds

Abstract: Somatic cells can be induced into pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) with a combination of four transcription factors, Oct4/Sox2/Klf4/c-Myc or Oct4/Sox2/Nanog/LIN28. This provides an enabling platform to obtain patient-specific cells for various therapeutic and research applications. However, several problems remain for this approach to be therapeutically relevant due to drawbacks associated with efficiency and viral genome integration. Recently, it was shown that neural progenitor cells (NPCs) transduced with Oct… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
611
0
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 828 publications
(624 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
6
611
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…cells and iPSCs may not be critical for the reprogramming process, as, by definition, these cells fail to become fully reprogrammed iPSCs. Recent identifications of small molecules capable of catalyzing or even replacing certain reprogramming factors provide an alternative means of analyzing the role of these four reprogramming factors in iPSC induction [22,[24][25][26][27]. Complicating this method, however, is the fact that small chemical compounds can bind to multiple targets and act on multiple signaling pathways that may not be relevant to the reprogramming process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cells and iPSCs may not be critical for the reprogramming process, as, by definition, these cells fail to become fully reprogrammed iPSCs. Recent identifications of small molecules capable of catalyzing or even replacing certain reprogramming factors provide an alternative means of analyzing the role of these four reprogramming factors in iPSC induction [22,[24][25][26][27]. Complicating this method, however, is the fact that small chemical compounds can bind to multiple targets and act on multiple signaling pathways that may not be relevant to the reprogramming process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These major drawbacks have severely impaired the utility of reprogrammed or deprogrammed or direct/trans-differentiated somatic cells as viable therapeutic approaches. Although small molecules used to induce hESC lineage-specific therapy derivatives are usually safe developmental signal molecules and morphogens, it should be cautious of the small molecules used in the reverse process to generate iPS cells or trans-differentiation, which are known toxic cancerogenic chemicals with too dangerous or even lethal side effects to be used for patients [3,21,48,49,63]. …”
Section: Defined Platform For Well-controlled Derivation Maintenamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although iPSCs have a distinct morphology and express molecular markers similar to ESCs, their capacity for multilineage differentiation after embryo complementation is extremely varied (Wernig et al, 2007;Shi et al, 2008a;Feng et al, 2009a). During reprogramming to pluripotency, there were the events of copy number variation, mutations of protein-coding regions, karotypic abnormalities and aberrant slicing of imprinting genes in iPS cells (Stadtfeld et al, 2010;Gore et al, 2011;Hussein et al, 2011).…”
Section: Improving the Quality Of Ips Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%