1998
DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[1061:iooitf]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

INDUCTION OF OVERCOMPENSATION IN THE FIELD GENTIAN,GENTIANELLA CAMPESTRIS

Abstract: We present field evidence for the induction of overcompensation, or increased fruit and seed yield as a consequence of damage, in the grassland biennial field gentian,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
144
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(69 reference statements)
4
144
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the plants' ability to compensate for lost biomass (plant tolerance) depends on environmental factors such as light, nutrient and water supply (Cronin and Lodge 2003;Maschinski and Whitham 1989). Plant tolerance may thus vary both in space and time (Lennartsson et al 1998), and interannual variability in local climate may interact with grazing to affect plant population dynamics (Evju et al 2010), e.g. through a larger reduction in population growth rate in unfavorable years in grazed versus ungrazed populations (Bastrenta et al 1995;Martorell 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the plants' ability to compensate for lost biomass (plant tolerance) depends on environmental factors such as light, nutrient and water supply (Cronin and Lodge 2003;Maschinski and Whitham 1989). Plant tolerance may thus vary both in space and time (Lennartsson et al 1998), and interannual variability in local climate may interact with grazing to affect plant population dynamics (Evju et al 2010), e.g. through a larger reduction in population growth rate in unfavorable years in grazed versus ungrazed populations (Bastrenta et al 1995;Martorell 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If available resources dictate that only a single cut is to be made, the timing of that cut is critical in determining whether seed production will be prevented. In general, plants clipped early in the growing season are more likely to compensate in growth and/or reproduction (Maschinski and Whitham 1989;Bergelson and Crawley 1992;Mutikainen et al 1994;Bergelson et al 1996;Lennartsson et al 1998). If clipping occurs later in the growing season, plants often have insufficient time for compensatory growth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Bergelson and Crawley (1992) and Bergelson et al (1996) criticized the suggestion by Paige and Whitham (1987) that the herb Ipomopsis aggregata may benefit from its ungulate herbivores, and attributed their finding of benefits to methodological limitations. However, more recent studies in different experimental designs in this (Paige 1999) and other systems (Lennartsson et al 1998;Rautio et al 2005) provide more solid support for overcompensation. According to Järemo et al (1999), differences in fitness definitions may account for the apparent discrepancy between the existence of overcompensation and the fact that plants cannot benefit directly from their consumers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The smallest and largest ones were not included into the experiment, so the finding of positive effect of clipping on S. maximum reproductive performance is not universal. In order to make the results more generally applicable, however, I did not restricted the experimental groups to single-sized individuals, as Lennartsson et al (1998) did, but tried to use individuals from a range of initial sizes and then to control for individual size, using it as a covariate in the statistical analyses. Paige (1999) took the same approach in another study on overcompensation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%