2009
DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.020800-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induction of morphological changes in Ustilago maydis cells by octyl gallate

Abstract: The effects of octyl gallate on Ustilago maydis yeast cells were analysed in relation to its capacity to oxidize compounds (pro-oxidant actions). All phenolic compounds tested inhibited the alternative oxidase (AOX). However, only octyl gallate induced a morphological change in yeast cells and collapsed the mitochondrial membrane potential. In contrast to octyl gallate, propyl gallate and nordihydroguaiaretic acid caused only a negligible cell change and the membrane potential was not affected. Our findings sh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, AOX inhibitors, such as BHAM, have the effect to enhance the activity of Kre-Me (or other MRC inhibitors) when co-applied. The OG-based chemosensitization to Kre-Me, performed in this study, indicated that the AOX-inhibitory activity of OG (Sierra-Campos et al, 2009; Robles-Martinez et al, 2013) is much higher than that of the conventional AOX inhibitor, BHAM. Noteworthy is that the efficacy of OG-based chemosensitization to Kre-Me (which was “synergistic”) was higher compared to the prior chemosensitization test with “2-hydroxy-5-methoxybenzaldehyde (phenolic) + antimycin A (MRC inhibitor)” (Kim et al, 2011), in which the level of compound interaction was “additive/indifferent” but not “synergistic.”…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Therefore, AOX inhibitors, such as BHAM, have the effect to enhance the activity of Kre-Me (or other MRC inhibitors) when co-applied. The OG-based chemosensitization to Kre-Me, performed in this study, indicated that the AOX-inhibitory activity of OG (Sierra-Campos et al, 2009; Robles-Martinez et al, 2013) is much higher than that of the conventional AOX inhibitor, BHAM. Noteworthy is that the efficacy of OG-based chemosensitization to Kre-Me (which was “synergistic”) was higher compared to the prior chemosensitization test with “2-hydroxy-5-methoxybenzaldehyde (phenolic) + antimycin A (MRC inhibitor)” (Kim et al, 2011), in which the level of compound interaction was “additive/indifferent” but not “synergistic.”…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The antifungal effects of gallate compounds in yeast cells expressing AOX, assumed to be due to the pro-oxidant action and not to their antioxidant capacity, induce a morphological change and collapse of the ΔΨ m (Sierra-Campos et al . 2009). It is well known that AOX inhibitors (such as SHAM) increase mitochondrial ROS production in organisms that possess AOX and that this increase is deleterious to the cells (Mlejnek, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mode of antifungal action of OG has been discussed in prior studies, where: (i) OG interrupts or disorganizes the lipid bilayer-protein interface in fungal cells [30]; and (ii) OG functions as a pro-oxidant (redox-active oxidative stressor), thus triggering cytotoxicity in fungi [31]. We speculate that, in addition to destabilizing cell wall integrity, disruption of cellular components by the pro-oxidant characteristic of OG could also be one mechanism of action for the enhancement of CAS activity during OG-mediated chemosensitization.…”
Section: Octyl Gallate Debilitates Antioxidant Mutants During Chemosementioning
confidence: 99%