2011
DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2011.45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induction of graft versus malignancy effect after unrelated allogeneic PBSCT using donor lymphocyte infusions derived from frozen aliquots of the original graft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(33 reference statements)
2
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[12][13][14] Administration of DLI has been shown to promote full-donor chimerism 15 and this may result in lower relapse rates. 14,[29][30][31][32] We postulated that early mixed T-cell chimerism may be effectively converted to full-donor T-cell chimerism by using preemptive low-dose DLI, even in the absence of relapse or persistence of malignancy. We also postulated that continuation, rather than withdrawal of post transplant immunosuppressive therapy, following DLI may minimize the risk of acute GVHD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14] Administration of DLI has been shown to promote full-donor chimerism 15 and this may result in lower relapse rates. 14,[29][30][31][32] We postulated that early mixed T-cell chimerism may be effectively converted to full-donor T-cell chimerism by using preemptive low-dose DLI, even in the absence of relapse or persistence of malignancy. We also postulated that continuation, rather than withdrawal of post transplant immunosuppressive therapy, following DLI may minimize the risk of acute GVHD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A matched pair analysis of patients receiving or not receiving DLI showed a significant advantage of patients given DLI; matching criteria were CR1 at day 120 from transplantation, absence of GvHD, and infection (54). Prophylactic DLI produced 80% long-term survival in several studies (5558), involving around 340 AML and ALL patients. GvHD was seen in 28% of patients given DLI, but it was fatal only in 9% of all patients treated (58).…”
Section: Prophylactic and Preemptive DLImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, G-CSF-primed DLI may behave differently depending upon the clinical conditions, and the evidence has shown that it may have a better role in the case of mixed chimerism, molecular or cytogenetic relapse and prophylactic therapy. [39][40][41] The rapid pace of the relapsed disease sometimes largely impedes the effect of DLI against acute leukemia. In addition, insufficient antigen presentation by the leukemic blasts with reduced or missing expression of co-stimulatory molecules to fail to induce significant T-cell proliferation could be another reason for the inferior DLI results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[39][40][41] Levine et al employed a salvage strategy with chemotherapy, followed by G-CSF-primed DLI for relapsed patients after BMT. Twenty-seven of fifty-seven assessable patients experienced a CR.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%