2010
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0901230107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induction of ectopic Myc target gene JAG2 augments hypoxic growth and tumorigenesis in a human B-cell model

Abstract: Ectopic Myc expression plays a key role in human tumorigenesis, and Myc dose-dependent tumorigenesis has been well established in transgenic mice, but the Myc target genes that are dependent on Myc levels have not been well characterized. In this regard, we used the human P493-6 B cells, which have a preneoplastic state dependent on the Epstein–Barr viral EBNA2 protein and a neoplastic state with ectopic inducible Myc, to identify putative ectopic Myc target genes. Among the ectopic targets, JAG2 that encodes … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, restimulation of previously c-Mycdepleted P493 cells via tetracycline withdrawal revealed a timedependent increase in LDHA, ERN1, HSPA5, XBP1t, and XBP1s mRNA ( Figure 2F and Supplemental Figure 2E) and protein ( Figure 2G), with maximal expression levels achieved by 24 to 48 hours. Importantly, IRE1α, BiP, XBP1s, and c-Myc protein levels in P493 High Myc cells were comparable to multiple bona fide BL cell lines: Raji, Daudi, Ramos, and EB-2 (Supplemental Figure 2F), consistent with the notion that P493 High Myc cells are a faithful BL model (20). ChIP-sequencing (ChIP-seq) analysis of P493 cells confirmed c-Myc binding to E-box sequences in the ERN1, HSPA5, and XBP1 promoters, confirming that c-Myc activates their transcription directly (Supplemental Figure 2G).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…First, restimulation of previously c-Mycdepleted P493 cells via tetracycline withdrawal revealed a timedependent increase in LDHA, ERN1, HSPA5, XBP1t, and XBP1s mRNA ( Figure 2F and Supplemental Figure 2E) and protein ( Figure 2G), with maximal expression levels achieved by 24 to 48 hours. Importantly, IRE1α, BiP, XBP1s, and c-Myc protein levels in P493 High Myc cells were comparable to multiple bona fide BL cell lines: Raji, Daudi, Ramos, and EB-2 (Supplemental Figure 2F), consistent with the notion that P493 High Myc cells are a faithful BL model (20). ChIP-sequencing (ChIP-seq) analysis of P493 cells confirmed c-Myc binding to E-box sequences in the ERN1, HSPA5, and XBP1 promoters, confirming that c-Myc activates their transcription directly (Supplemental Figure 2G).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…With the aim of identifying MYC-regulated lncRNAs that could play a driving role in lymphoma development, we set up a bioinformatic pipeline to screen for lncRNAs differentially regulated in MYCinducible model cell lines and a set of BL samples. In particular, we used RNA-seq data obtained from (i) hT-RPE-MycER cells, an immortalized retinal pigment epithelial cell line expressing the MycER fusion protein (a cell line shown to be a relevant tool for the study of several aspects of MYC activity in oncogenic transformation) (38,39); (ii) P493-6 cells, an immortalized B-lymphoblastic cell line carrying a tetracyclin-inducible MYC construct that was shown to be a good model to study MYC-induced lymphomas (40,41); and (iii) 91 GC B cell-derived lymphoma samples subjected to RNA-seq in the framework of the International Cancer Genome Consortium project on malignant lymphoma [ICGC MMML-Seq (International Cancer Genome Consortium Molecular Mechanisms in Malignant Lymphoma by Sequencing)], including 16 BLs, 35 DLBCLs, 40 FLs, and 4 controls (normal GC B-cell samples) (Table S1). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several mechanisms have been proposed including direct icN1 stabilization by interaction with HIF proteins (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18). As of yet, little attention has been given to Notch ligand regulation and the effects this may have on Notch activation under hypoxia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%