1973
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(73)90349-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induction of DNA polymerase in mouse L cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
1

Year Published

1974
1974
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
53
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding that at least the initial phase of increased polymerase activity was sensitive to the presence of NEM would suggest that either DNA polymerase-a or DNA-polymerase-y or both are involved in this response, but not DNA polymerase-po Our finding is in apparent contradiction to much recent work which has suggested that DNA polymerase-p is the major repair enzyme whilst DNA polymerase-a and DNA polymerase-yare involved in semiconservative DNA synthesis (see Chang et al 1973;Bertazzoni et al 1976;Robison and Fansler 1978;Hiibscher et al 1979). However, some authors, for example Hiibscher et al (1979), have not ruled out the possibility of some minor involvement of DNA polymerase-a and perhaps DNA polymerase-y in repair.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…The finding that at least the initial phase of increased polymerase activity was sensitive to the presence of NEM would suggest that either DNA polymerase-a or DNA-polymerase-y or both are involved in this response, but not DNA polymerase-po Our finding is in apparent contradiction to much recent work which has suggested that DNA polymerase-p is the major repair enzyme whilst DNA polymerase-a and DNA polymerase-yare involved in semiconservative DNA synthesis (see Chang et al 1973;Bertazzoni et al 1976;Robison and Fansler 1978;Hiibscher et al 1979). However, some authors, for example Hiibscher et al (1979), have not ruled out the possibility of some minor involvement of DNA polymerase-a and perhaps DNA polymerase-y in repair.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…If the 8-S enzyme were a dimer, then the 1 0 s and the 12.3-S enzymes could probably be the trimer and the tetramer of a monomeric protein with a molecular weight of about 90000. Taking into account the fact that in tissues of higher organisms the concentration of the 6 -8-S DNA polymerase is very high during active growth [3,4] it could be assumed that this might be also the case in yeast. The 3.4-S polymerase might therefore be hardly detectable in the presence of an excess of the high-molecular-weight species.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This also makes it unlikely that the enzyme is mitochondria1 DNA polymerase. While the relationship, on interconversion, between At, A2 and C has been described [13] and the likely proteolytic origin of the 5.2 S enzyme, B, has been indicated both in mammalian cells [6,14] and in Drosophilu [27], the origin of enzyme D is uncertain. Properties such as closeness of their molecular weights, sensitivity to inhibition by N-ethylmaleimide, heat inactivation at 45 "C and lack of conversion to any other species by mild urea treatment, indicate that enzyme D more closely resembles enzyme C than A1 or Az.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When preparations of DNA polymerase-a from calf thymus, freed of DNA polymerase-p and terminal transferase, are fractionated on DEAE-cellulose, several peaks of polymerase-a activity can be detected using activated DNA in assays carried out at pH 7.8 [5,13]. From tissue frozen shortly after removal from the animal these are enzymes A1, A2 and C. A further enzyme B appears occasionally and is probably derived by proteolysis from enzyme C [6] (see also [14]). However, assay of the same DEAEcellulose profile with the synthetic template-initiator complex poly (dA) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%