2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induction of DNA double-strand breaks in primary gingival fibroblasts by exposure to dental resin composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
102
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(56 reference statements)
11
102
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The antioxidant concentration used was chosen on the basis that previous studies revealed a reduction of the TEGDMA and HEMA genotoxicity at a dose of 10 mM NAC 11,48,49) . As in our previous experiments we used cells exposed to 1 mM hydrogenperoxide (Sigma-Aldrich) dissolved in medium 28) and 0.5 Gy X-ray exposed cells 30) as a positive controls (not shown; see refs. 28,30).…”
Section: Chemicalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The antioxidant concentration used was chosen on the basis that previous studies revealed a reduction of the TEGDMA and HEMA genotoxicity at a dose of 10 mM NAC 11,48,49) . As in our previous experiments we used cells exposed to 1 mM hydrogenperoxide (Sigma-Aldrich) dissolved in medium 28) and 0.5 Gy X-ray exposed cells 30) as a positive controls (not shown; see refs. 28,30).…”
Section: Chemicalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in our previous experiments we used cells exposed to 1 mM hydrogenperoxide (Sigma-Aldrich) dissolved in medium 28) and 0.5 Gy X-ray exposed cells 30) as a positive controls (not shown; see refs. 28,30).…”
Section: Chemicalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Resinbased dental composites may release components from the resinous matrix, which could be initially due to partial polymerization, and/or later due to degradation processes over time [1][2][3][4] . These released components come into contact with oral tissues and may have various drawbacks like urticarial and mucosal reactions 5 , development of allergy and hypersensitivity reactions in patients 6 , modifications of gingival fibroblasts morphology and reduction on type I collagen protein 7 , immunosuppression or immunostimulation on mitogen-driven proliferation of purified T-lymphocytes and spleen cells 8 and DNA damage in primary human gingival fibroblasts, which underlines their genotoxic potential 9 . Many parameters can affect dental composite toxicity such as the shade of the composite, the light curing, the chemical composition of the resin monomer, the filler and the degree of conversion [10][11][12][13] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%