2018
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.76.2591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Cetuximab Radiotherapy Is Not Superior to Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Head and Neck Carcinomas: Results of the GORTEC 2007-02 Phase III Randomized Trial

Abstract: Purpose Both concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CT-RT) and cetuximab radiotherapy (cetux-RT) have been established as the standard of care for the treatment of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. It was not known whether the addition of induction chemotherapy before cetux-RT could improve outcomes compared with standard of care CT-RT. Patients and Methods The current trial was restricted to patients with nonmetastatic N2b, N2c, or N3 squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and fit fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
67
2
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
67
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, GORTEC 2007-02 showed no improvement in PFS or OS with induction chemotherapy followed by cetuximab radiotherapy compared to chemoradiotherapy, though there was a reduction in the rate of distant metastases (DM) in the induction chemotherapy arm [8]. p16 status was stratified (n = 26, 31% in CRT arm, n = 19, 21% in TPF and cetuximab RT arm), but results were consistent with the overall population.…”
Section: Induction Chemotherapy In Non-surgical Managementmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…More recently, GORTEC 2007-02 showed no improvement in PFS or OS with induction chemotherapy followed by cetuximab radiotherapy compared to chemoradiotherapy, though there was a reduction in the rate of distant metastases (DM) in the induction chemotherapy arm [8]. p16 status was stratified (n = 26, 31% in CRT arm, n = 19, 21% in TPF and cetuximab RT arm), but results were consistent with the overall population.…”
Section: Induction Chemotherapy In Non-surgical Managementmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…It is conceivable that the benefit of ICT could be expected in N3 HNSCC patients who are at increased risk of distant metastases. 8,12 This study represents a retrospective single-institution analysis of the therapeutic results in 120 HNSCC patients with N3 disease treated with induction chemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiation/radiotherapy. To our knowledge, this study is the largest series focusing on the role of induction chemotherapy in N3 HNSCC in a single center.…”
Section: Inductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Adding taxane to cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (PF) has been shown to improve response rate, time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS) compared with PF. 8,9 Thus, the applicability of the outcomes of these trials to patients with N3 HNSCC is unclear. Unfortunately, only 22% and 11% of patients with N3 disease had been enrolled in the two studies despite this being a stated goal of study accrual.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bei Inoperabilität steht die de finitive RCT zu Verfügung. Versuche, die weiterhin schlechte Pro gnose der Patienten mit N2 und N3Status durch eine Induktion schemotherapie zu verbessern, konnten bisher keinen Vorteil für das progressionsfreie Überleben oder das Gesamtüberleben de monstrieren und führen zudem zu einer erhöhten Toxizität[11].…”
unclassified