The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.genrep.2021.101104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inducible clindamycin resistance among clinical Staphylococcus aureus strains in Iran: A contemporaneous systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Various studies have reported a comparable proportion of inducible clindamycin resistance among S. aureus isolates obtained from human sources such as studies in Odisha state, eastern India, 22.0% [ 7 ]; Nepal, 23.4% [ 34 ]; Malaysia, 22.1% [ 35 ]; and Israel, 20.0% to 25.0% [ 36 ]. This finding is significantly higher than the findings of the iMLSB phenotype from the systematic review and meta-analysis in Iran with 10.4% overall prevalence [ 37 ]. In Indian studies, inducible clindamycin resistance rate was 5.2% in Kashmir valley [ 38 ], 7% in Assam [ 39 ], 15.2% in Chennai [ 40 ], 13.71% in the sub-Himalayan region [ 41 ], and 14.8% in central India [ 42 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Various studies have reported a comparable proportion of inducible clindamycin resistance among S. aureus isolates obtained from human sources such as studies in Odisha state, eastern India, 22.0% [ 7 ]; Nepal, 23.4% [ 34 ]; Malaysia, 22.1% [ 35 ]; and Israel, 20.0% to 25.0% [ 36 ]. This finding is significantly higher than the findings of the iMLSB phenotype from the systematic review and meta-analysis in Iran with 10.4% overall prevalence [ 37 ]. In Indian studies, inducible clindamycin resistance rate was 5.2% in Kashmir valley [ 38 ], 7% in Assam [ 39 ], 15.2% in Chennai [ 40 ], 13.71% in the sub-Himalayan region [ 41 ], and 14.8% in central India [ 42 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…While all of these isolates were found to be resistant to penicillin, methicillin resistance was not detected in any of them. In a review which analyzed the data of the studies conducted on prevalence of MLS resistance in S. aureus strains isolated from humans in Iran, it was reported that the prevalence of iML resistance was 10% in S. aureus strains isolated from clinical samples taken from humans [46]. Çetin et al [47] reported that iML resistance was found in 15% of S. aureus isolates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%