2008
DOI: 10.1177/154405910808700901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induced Premaxillary Suture Fusion: Class III Malocclusion Model

Abstract: The etiology of class III malocclusion remains unknown. The present study investigates the relationship between craniofacial morphology and premaxillary suture fusion to test the hypothesis that class III malocclusion may be related to premaxillary suture fusion. Cyanoacrylate was applied to immobilize the left premaxillary suture in the experimental group. Sham surgeries in rats were used for controls. Dental impressions and radiographs were taken before and after surgery for comparison of craniofacial differ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A biomechanical relationship between cranial sutures and mastication has also been proven in experimental animals. In rats, artificial fusion of a suture can lead to malocclusion, and malocclusion can lead to suture remodelling (Kasahara 2000;Ruan et al 2008). In the present case, multiple suture exostoses were found concurrent to a nasal septum chondrosarcoma.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A biomechanical relationship between cranial sutures and mastication has also been proven in experimental animals. In rats, artificial fusion of a suture can lead to malocclusion, and malocclusion can lead to suture remodelling (Kasahara 2000;Ruan et al 2008). In the present case, multiple suture exostoses were found concurrent to a nasal septum chondrosarcoma.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%
“…In rats, artificial fusion of a suture can lead to malocclusion, and malocclusion can lead to suture remodelling (Kasahara ; Ruan et al . ). In the present case, multiple suture exostoses were found concurrent to a nasal septum chondrosarcoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As previously mentioned, Class III malocclusion may result from maxillary retrognathism and/or mandibular overgrowth, and both FGFR2 and FGFR3 may be related to maxillary retrognathism and/or hypoplasia, as evidenced by their involvement in cranial suture biology and craniosynostosis. Induced premaxillary suture fusion has been shown to affect craniofacial morphology, and implies that abnormal premaxillary suture function may result in Class III malocclusion (Ruan et al ., 2008). Moreover, constitutive gain-of-function mutations within FGFR1 and FGFR2 , and dominant-negative mutation of FGFR3 , are causing strikingly different phenotypes, all of which are involving craniosynostosis as a distinctive feature of an underlying syndrome (Wilkie, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously revealed, class III malocclusion is may the consequence of mandibular prognathism and/ or maxillary retrognathism 36) mentioned that FGFR2 and FGFR3 might be allied to maxillary retrognathism as showed by their contribution in cranial suture biology and craniosynostosis that may be the outcome of class III malocclusion due to abnormal premaxillary suture function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%