2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2016.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Meet Genome Editing

Abstract: It is extremely rare for a single experiment to be so impactful and timely that it shapes and forecasts the experiments of the next decade. Here, we review how two such experiments --the generation of human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and the development of CRISPR/Cas9 technology-- have fundamentally reshaped our approach to biomedical research, stem cell biology and human genetics. We will also highlight the previous knowledge that iPSC and CRISPR/Cas9 technologies were built on as this groundwork … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
330
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 412 publications
(339 citation statements)
references
References 197 publications
0
330
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…When different JAG1 mutations were engineered onto the same genetic background, the mutations (Cys829X and ALGS2) found in subjects with severe liver disease impaired organoid development, while a mutation (Gly274Asp) causing TOF in subjects without liver disease did not impair organoid formation. The combined use of iPSCs and genome editing technologies has enabled revolutionary advances in many areas (61). Our results indicate how this organoid system and genome editing can be jointly used to determine how human disease-causing mutations affect organ development and the pathogenesis of human genetic diseases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…When different JAG1 mutations were engineered onto the same genetic background, the mutations (Cys829X and ALGS2) found in subjects with severe liver disease impaired organoid development, while a mutation (Gly274Asp) causing TOF in subjects without liver disease did not impair organoid formation. The combined use of iPSCs and genome editing technologies has enabled revolutionary advances in many areas (61). Our results indicate how this organoid system and genome editing can be jointly used to determine how human disease-causing mutations affect organ development and the pathogenesis of human genetic diseases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Other cells from easier to harvest sources have been differentiated into Schwann‐like cells, including skin‐derived precursors, mesenchymal stem cells, and adipose tissue‐derived stem cells,41, 44, 45 although these too would have limited utility in inherited myelin disorders, and difficulty with scale of production. iPSCs are a highly attractive source for cell therapy because they are easy to generate, are infinitely expandable, and can be readily manipulated using genome‐editing techniques to correct disease gene defects 46. Several groups have reported differentiating Schwann‐like cells from iPSCs 29, 47, 48.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, detection of slight phenotypic changes between cells differentiated from a patient or control iPSCs may not reveal a relevant phenotypic difference between both groups of cells but rather reflect the system's intrinsic dissimilarity between individual iPSC lines [27]. It is for that reason that isogenic pairs composed of diseasespecific and control iPSCs that differ exclusively at the diseasecausing mutation have been generated, being presently the best disease in a dish model strategy [28,29]. This approach has been possible thanks to last advances in gene editing (CRISPR-Cas9; TALENs; ZFN) [30,31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%