Induced Movement-in-Depth: Relative Location of Static Stimulus and Direction Asymmetry

Reinhardt-Rutland, Anthony

doi:10.2466/pms.1983.57.1.255

Cited by 12 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…With regard to induced movement without overall displacement of the inducing stimulus, surrounding of the induced stimulus by the inducing stimulus is important for induced rotation (Day, 1981;Reinhardt-Rutland, 1981) and induced movement in depth (Reinhardt-Rutland, 1983c); investigations of linear induced movement without overall displacement of the inducing stimulus seem invariably to have involved an inducing stimulus surrounding the induced stimulus (Day & Dickinson, 1977;Levi & Schor, 1984;Nakayama & Tyler, 1978;Over & Lovegrove, 1973;Tynan & Sekuler, 1975).…”

Section: Possible Distinction Between Induced Movement With and Withomentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Such differences raise the question of whether acceleration of the inducing stimulus may have an effect: It seems likely that induced movement from oscillatory motion can be stronger than induced movement from steady motion (Speed Effects section). In induced movement without overall displacement of the inducing stimulus, the inducing movement can be steady (e.g., Day, 1981;Levi & Schor, 1984;Over & Lovegrove, 1973;Reinhardt-Rutland, 1981, 1983c.…”

Section: Form Of the Induced Stimulusmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition, a number of researchers have used displays in which movement is centrifugal or centripetal, so that systematic eye movements are, presumably, not possible (Fame, 1972;Gogel, 1977;Gogel & Griffin, 1982;Nakayama & Tyler, 1978;Reinhardt-Rutland, 1983c;Wade & Swanston, 1984).…”

Section: Eye Movementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Timing induced movement during a fixed period of operation of the inducing stimulus (e.g., Reinhardt-Rutland, 1981, 1983c. This assumes a form of induced movement that is likely to be intermittent, is subject to decay, or both.…”

Section: Response Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For induced rotation, the inducing stimulus has often been a patterned annulus surrounding and concentric with the induced stimulus (Day, 1981;Reinhardt-Rutland, 1981). For induced movement in depth, the inducing stimulation has included a surface oscillating in depth (Fame, 1970(Fame, , 1972, binocularly generated oscillation in depth of dots (Gogel & Griffin, 1982), and a rotating spiral (Reinhardt-Rutland, 1983c. Induced expansion and contraction arose from a grating "zooming in" and "zooming out" within a fixed window (Wade & Swanston, 1984).…”

Section: Types Of Displaymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Induced movement in the visual modality: An overview.

Reinhardt-Rutland¹

1988

Psychological Bulletin

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Induced movement, illusory movement in a stationary stimulus resulting from adjoining movement, has received steady experimental investigation over the last 70 years or so. It is observed under different viewing conditions in a wide variety of displays that differ considerably in overall size and in form of inducing and induced stimuli. Explanations have been diverse, some being based on relations within the display and others invoking mediation by other aspects of the observer's perception. Probably, no one explanation can account for all forms of induced movement. Current knowledge about induced movement may have important implications for visual perception of object morion. Among possibly important factors is size of display, which can vary from two small spots (e.g., Carr & Hardy, 1920) to displays occupying most of the observer's visual field (e.g., Post, 1986).A second major purpose of this overview is to examine explanations for induced movement (Explanations section). Duncker's (1929Duncker's ( /1938 findings have had an important influence here, although many of his suggestions have subsequently been shown to require at least some modification. For example, his theory I thank J. Morss for reading an earlier version of this article, J. Ravey for translation, and two anonymous referees for helpful suggestions.

show abstract

Section: Possible Distinction Between Induced Movement With and Withomentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Form Of the Induced Stimulusmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Eye Movementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Response Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Types Of Displaymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Induced movement in the visual modality: An overview.

Reinhardt-Rutland¹

1988

Psychological Bulletin

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Perceiving-the-present and a unifying theory of illusions

Changizi¹,

Hsieh²,

Nijhawan³

et al. 2010

Space and Time in Perception and Action

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The vista paradox: Framing or contrast?

Daum

Both

Bertamini

et al. 2015

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Perfor

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The vista paradox is the illusion in which an object seen through a window appears to shrink in apparent size (and appears farther away) as the observer approaches the window. Paradoxically, the distal object appears smaller as its visual angle increases. We investigated the effect in four experiments varying object size, distance, point of fixation, and texture of the frame and of the object. In the first experiment, we tried to confirm the illusion and to test the robustness of the phenomenon. In the second experiment, we manipulated where subjects fixated (on the frame or on the object) as well as the texture of the object and the frame. Fixation was essential for the illusion: fixating the frame led to an apparent shrinking of the object, whereas fixation on the object did not. Texture of the frame intensified the apparent shrinking of the object. In a third experiment, we separated the point of fixation from the frame in a between-subjects design. Finally, in Experiment 4, we showed that the paradox does not require a frame, but it requires a fixation on a location different from the object. That is, the window or frame is dispensable for the vista paradox, but fixation is critical.

show abstract

Induced Movement-in-Depth: Relative Location of Static Stimulus and Direction Asymmetry

Cited by 12 publications

References 10 publications

Induced movement in the visual modality: An overview.

Induced movement in the visual modality: An overview.

Perceiving-the-present and a unifying theory of illusions

The vista paradox: Framing or contrast?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About