2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9525(02)00040-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induced gene expression in human brain after the split from chimpanzee

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
80
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
6
80
3
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternate, albeit related, explanation would be that regions with low genetic variance have greater functional constraints on their determinants of cortical thickness, such that genetic mutations influencing these regions will typically be eliminated quickly from the population through purifying selection. Comparative genomic experiments have shown that a subset of neurally-expressed genes have evolved more rapidly in humans than in other primates [Chimpanzee Sequencing and Analysis Consortium, 2005;Dorus et al, 2004;Khaitovich et al, 2005]; both gene expression changes and protein sequence modification have accelerated in humans relative to nonhuman primates [Caceres et al, 2003;Enard et al, 2002;Gu and Gu, 2003;Hsieh et al, 2003;Uddin et al, 2004]. The findings of increased genetic variance in evolutionarily recent structures may represent a remnant of these rapid neurogenetic changes that accompanied our divergence from other primates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternate, albeit related, explanation would be that regions with low genetic variance have greater functional constraints on their determinants of cortical thickness, such that genetic mutations influencing these regions will typically be eliminated quickly from the population through purifying selection. Comparative genomic experiments have shown that a subset of neurally-expressed genes have evolved more rapidly in humans than in other primates [Chimpanzee Sequencing and Analysis Consortium, 2005;Dorus et al, 2004;Khaitovich et al, 2005]; both gene expression changes and protein sequence modification have accelerated in humans relative to nonhuman primates [Caceres et al, 2003;Enard et al, 2002;Gu and Gu, 2003;Hsieh et al, 2003;Uddin et al, 2004]. The findings of increased genetic variance in evolutionarily recent structures may represent a remnant of these rapid neurogenetic changes that accompanied our divergence from other primates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies found a high rate of expression changes in the brain along the human lineage (Enard et al, 2002;Gu and Gu, 2003;Khaitovich et al, 2005a, b), while other studies found little or no evidence of an accelerated rate (Hsieh et al, 2003;Uddin et al, 2004;Gilad et al, 2006a, b). The reasons for these differences may be technical or methodological and have been discussed elsewhere (Gilad et al, 2006a, b).…”
Section: Comparative Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It remains highly controversial as to what factors could determine the evolutionary rate of expression and sequence divergence (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15). An important issue is the role of tissue-specific factors in genomic evolution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important issue is the role of tissue-specific factors in genomic evolution. Several studies have suggested that tissue-specific constraints may generate amongtissue variation of expression divergence between human and chimpanzee (3,4,6,8), or between human and mouse (16). Moreover, it has been found (17,18) that the rate of expression divergence may be negatively associated to the broadness of tissue expression of the gene.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%