2002
DOI: 10.1021/bi012112o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Induced Formation of a DNA Bulge Structure by a Molecular Wedge Ligand−Postactivated Neocarzinostatin Chromophore

Abstract: Our previous structure elucidation of the complexes of DNA and postactivated neocarzinostatin chromophore (NCS-chrom) compounds revealed two distinctly different binding modes of this antitumor molecule. A thorough understanding of these results will provide the molecular basis for the binding and DNA chain cleavage properties of NCS-chrom. NCSi-gb is one of the postactivated mimics of NCS-chrom which is formed under thiol-free conditions and is able to bind to DNA. This report describes the structure refineme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the more flexible dA5·dT14 pair of the NCSigb•bulged DNA complex is much more twisted and buckled than that of the dG20·dC8 pair in the SCA-α2•bulged DNA complex ( Figure 6A and C). The G20 residue stacks right above the BI ring platform and results in the NMR up-field shift of the G20 imino proton due to ring current effect ( Figure 6A and C); on the other hand, the T14 residue stacks poorly, off-center and tilted, on the THI ring platform (Figure 6B and D) and, therefore, exhibits much less upfield shift than expected (16). Accordingly, it was proposed that the removal of the bulky cyclocarbonate moiety would likely improve the binding behavior (16,17).…”
Section: Structural Comparison Of the Two Complexesmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As a result, the more flexible dA5·dT14 pair of the NCSigb•bulged DNA complex is much more twisted and buckled than that of the dG20·dC8 pair in the SCA-α2•bulged DNA complex ( Figure 6A and C). The G20 residue stacks right above the BI ring platform and results in the NMR up-field shift of the G20 imino proton due to ring current effect ( Figure 6A and C); on the other hand, the T14 residue stacks poorly, off-center and tilted, on the THI ring platform (Figure 6B and D) and, therefore, exhibits much less upfield shift than expected (16). Accordingly, it was proposed that the removal of the bulky cyclocarbonate moiety would likely improve the binding behavior (16,17).…”
Section: Structural Comparison Of the Two Complexesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The imino, amino and nonexchangeable protons have been assigned using standard methodologies described in previous publications (16,21,27). Imino-imino NOE connectivities are observed between all adjacent base-pairs on either side of the bulge (peaks a to g in Figure 3A).…”
Section: Noe Analysis Of Imino Proton Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In these cases, the conformation and surface properties of nucleic acids likely contribute to the observed rate enhancements of reaction (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25). Probably the best studied example of this type of DNA-promoted process involves nucleobase reaction with cyclopropylpyrroloindole derivatives such as those found in natural products CC-1065 and the duocarmycins as well as a related synthetic analog bizelsin, currently undergoing clinical investigation (26)(27)(28)(29).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%