Induced dimensional set and concept learning

Fernandez, Don

doi:10.3758/bf03333364

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The stimuli for assessing dimensional dominance were two-dimensional figures presented in triads on 12 x 17 cm white cards. Eight stimulus cards were randomly selected from the stimulus set of 24 cards previously used by Fernandez (1973). Each card contained three figures arranged at the corners of an undrawn equilateral triangle.…”

Section: Stimulimentioning

confidence: 99%

Visual dimensional dominance and haptic form recognition

Micallef

May

1976

Bull. Psychon. Soc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Eighty-two preschool children were assessed for dimensional dominance by asking them to make similarities judgments about two dimensional geometric figures varying in form, color, and size. They also participated in two tests of haptic form recognition of three dimensional forms, once with one hand and once with two hands. The results indicate that recognition performance of form dominant subjects was substantially superior to the performance of nonform subjects. Children of mixed dominance improved on the second test, generating a significant type of Dominance bY'Tests interaction. Order of administration of dominance and haptic tests had no significant influence on recognition performance.

show abstract

Section: Stimulimentioning

confidence: 99%

Visual dimensional dominance and haptic form recognition

Micallef

May

1976

Bull. Psychon. Soc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Dimensional Dominance Hierarchies and the Matching of Letters and Words

May

Oliver

Fernandez

1976

Journal of Reading Behavior

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Dimensional dominance was assessed by having kindergarten children make similarities judgments about geometric figures varying in form, color, and size. Children who were classified as form dominant performed better than children who were not form dominant when given a test of letter matching ability in Experiment 1 and in repeated tests of word matching ability in Experiment 2. Data from the retest in Experiment 2 supported the hypothesis that dimensional dominance progresses from color dominance to form dominance, and then to mixed responding.

show abstract

Induced dimensional set and concept learning

Cited by 2 publications

References 13 publications

Visual dimensional dominance and haptic form recognition

Visual dimensional dominance and haptic form recognition

Dimensional Dominance Hierarchies and the Matching of Letters and Words

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About