2018
DOI: 10.1109/lawp.2018.2872051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indoor Small-Scale Spatiotemporal Propagation Characteristics at Multiple Millimeter-Wave Bands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has prompted several propagation studies across the world to derive path loss models for the envisaged deployment scenarios and to estimate wideband channel parameters such as r.m.s . delay spread to aid in the design of 5G networks (Keusgen et al, ; mmMagic Deliverable 2.2, ; Raimundo et al, ; Sun et al, ; Zhang et al, ; Zhang et al, ). Due to the spread across multiple bands with different bandwidths and the need to characterize the radio channel in these new bands in preparations for WRC 2019, a number of correspondence groups were formed in three of the working parties of Study Group 3 (SG3) of the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) which provides recommendations on radio wave propagation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has prompted several propagation studies across the world to derive path loss models for the envisaged deployment scenarios and to estimate wideband channel parameters such as r.m.s . delay spread to aid in the design of 5G networks (Keusgen et al, ; mmMagic Deliverable 2.2, ; Raimundo et al, ; Sun et al, ; Zhang et al, ; Zhang et al, ). Due to the spread across multiple bands with different bandwidths and the need to characterize the radio channel in these new bands in preparations for WRC 2019, a number of correspondence groups were formed in three of the working parties of Study Group 3 (SG3) of the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) which provides recommendations on radio wave propagation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there have been multiple studies on indoor broadband channel measurements in two 5G mmWave bands, i.e., 28 GHz [14][15][16] and 39 GHz [17,18], mainly focusing on the characterization of propagation channels in several unique environments such as conference rooms, cubicle offices, corridors, and entrance halls. In-building measurement results show that the path loss exponents (PLEs) are generally smaller than the theoretical free space PLE of 2 under the line-of-sight (LoS) condition with vertical-to-vertical (V-V) polarimetric combination [15,17] due to the existence of rich multipath components (MPCs) reflected or diffracted from physical objects in the concerned environments [18,19]. However, conventional indoor path loss models for NLoS links, fitted via field measurement data using synthesized omnidirectional antennas, usually consider blocking effects as a part of shadow fading with larger PLEs [5,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement-based path loss and space-time channel models across different frequencies and bandwidths in indoor environment are derived. In contrast to the analysis in [14][15][16][17][18], the transition from shadow regions to totally blocked regions is studied in terms of directional and omnidirectional path loss, delay spread (DS), and azimuth angular spread of arrival and departure (ASA/ASD). The bandwidth dependency of channel parameters are discussed with a focus on the impulse dispersion of multipath channels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only signals from one or two fixed zenith angles of arrival and departure (ZoA/ZoD) were measured due to the fact that traditional step-by-step DSS method is time-consuming to collect sufficient channel data. It is also important to note that some mmWave small-scale channel model parameters are frequency-dependent and environment-specific [22], [23], whereas only a handful of outdoor measurement activities focus on these effects with the same measurement configurations [17], [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%