Mobile Robots - State of the Art in Land, Sea, Air, and Collaborative Missions 2009
DOI: 10.5772/6998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indoor Localization Techniques Based on Wireless Sensor Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it has limitations in indoor environments due to the large attenuation caused by buildings' walls and ceilings [7]. To extend the capability of mobile localization applications in indoor environments, researchers worked on alternative solutions based on various types of signals like ultra wide band, WiFi, zigbee, bluetooth, etc [8], [9], [10]. One of the advantages of WiFi signals over the others is that one can rely only on the Access Points (APs) present inside the building, with no need to additional hardware.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has limitations in indoor environments due to the large attenuation caused by buildings' walls and ceilings [7]. To extend the capability of mobile localization applications in indoor environments, researchers worked on alternative solutions based on various types of signals like ultra wide band, WiFi, zigbee, bluetooth, etc [8], [9], [10]. One of the advantages of WiFi signals over the others is that one can rely only on the Access Points (APs) present inside the building, with no need to additional hardware.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has limitations in indoor environments [4]. Alternative solutions consist of using other types of signals, that are available in closed environments, like ultra wide band, WiFi, zigbee, bluetooth,etc [5], [6], [7], [8]. One of the advantages of WiFi signals over the others is that one can rely only on the Access Points (APs) present inside the building, with no additional hardware.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ubiquitous computing, locating user's mobile device is one of the key issues to enable transparent and immediate services to user. Several localization techniques have been proposed that are based on GPS [1], cellular [2][3][4] or Wi-Fi [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] technologies. Although GPS-based technology has been improved to get the accuracy of up to a few meters [1], it can only be applied for outdoor locations since GPS signals from the satellites can be blocked easily by buildings, trees and other obstacles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches using cellular technology [2][3][4] can work for both outdoor and indoor locations (covered by cell towers) but offers low accuracy (several hundred meters). Recently, many approaches using Wi-Fi (802.11) signals [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] have been proposed for indoor locations thanks to their high accuracy rate and the increasingly popularity of the 802.11 access points. According to [5,6], Wi-Fi based localization algorithms can be divided into four main categories: range-based, range-free (such as centroid [7,8]), scene matching (such as fingerprint [5,9]), aggregate and singular.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%