2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2019.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indoor hospital air and the impact of ventilation on bioaerosols: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
98
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
2
98
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Legionellae bacteria can grow in building water systems and become aerosolized by aeration systems and water sprays, while the flushing of toilets can aerosolize bacteria contained in feces such as Clostridium difficile (Best, Sandoe and Wilcox 2012; Springston and Yocavitch 2017). Indoor bioaerosol sampling for bacteria is often performed because of health concerns from exposure, particularly in locations such as healthcare facilities where the risks of disease transmission are heightened (Stockwell et al 2019).…”
Section: Indoor Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Legionellae bacteria can grow in building water systems and become aerosolized by aeration systems and water sprays, while the flushing of toilets can aerosolize bacteria contained in feces such as Clostridium difficile (Best, Sandoe and Wilcox 2012; Springston and Yocavitch 2017). Indoor bioaerosol sampling for bacteria is often performed because of health concerns from exposure, particularly in locations such as healthcare facilities where the risks of disease transmission are heightened (Stockwell et al 2019).…”
Section: Indoor Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this fact did not cause any significant differences in temperature and microbial growth. Different observations were made by Stockwell et al (2019), who recorded significantly higher bioaerosol concentrations (201 CFU m -3 ) in areas with natural ventilation as compared to areas with mechanical ventilation (20 CFU m -3 ) in hospitals. The results indicated that the smaller cubic capacity of a facility may contribute to a higher concentration of airborne bacteria.…”
Section: The Impact Of Selected Factors On the Concentration Of Micromentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Pasquarella et al demonstrated that 80 CFU/m 3 could be reached during operational conditions [29], and Vonci et al demonstrated that 50 CFU/m 3 could be recorded in operating theatres equipped with turbulent flow ventilation at 15 air changes per hour [44]. In a recent revision, Stockwell et al reported a microbial air contamination of 20 CFU/m 3 in hospital areas equipped with conventional mechanical ventilation systems [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%