2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10901-019-09659-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indoor environmental quality in relation to socioeconomic indicators in Slovenian households

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of the significant variables in both models were related to the buildings, i.e., for the thermal comfort rating: climate zone, U-value (external walls), window to heated living area ratio, living area, building location, heating system, building period of construction, window opening type, and indoor air temperature; and for the air quality rating: climate zone, moisture damages (last 12 months/5 years), oiled wood floor, painting, dwelling type, window vents, and indoor relative humidity. The findings support prior studies, whether they were conducted in similar or varying contexts or under comparable or different climatic conditions [15][16][17]19,24,25,27,[62][63][64][65][66][67].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The majority of the significant variables in both models were related to the buildings, i.e., for the thermal comfort rating: climate zone, U-value (external walls), window to heated living area ratio, living area, building location, heating system, building period of construction, window opening type, and indoor air temperature; and for the air quality rating: climate zone, moisture damages (last 12 months/5 years), oiled wood floor, painting, dwelling type, window vents, and indoor relative humidity. The findings support prior studies, whether they were conducted in similar or varying contexts or under comparable or different climatic conditions [15][16][17]19,24,25,27,[62][63][64][65][66][67].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Zalejska-Jonsson et al examined the link between overall satisfaction with indoor environmental quality and thermal satisfaction in multi-family buildings in Sweden, finding significant correlations with building characteristics and individual differences, including climate zone, construction year, time spent outside the home, gender, smoking habits, and age [21]. In contrast to the past, where the focus was mainly on the building's architecture and physical attributes, recent research on residential buildings has pivoted towards examining primarily the socio-demographic characteristics of occupants, including gender, age, and other factors (i.e., health and well-being), highlighting a shift from building-oriented to occupant-oriented studies [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Socio-economic status is related to indoor environmental quality issues. The results of the online pilot survey in Slovenia on 714 respondents (Recek 2017;Recek et al 2019) showed that households with a better socio-economic status spend more household income for a better living comfort and consequently stay in facilities with better indoor environmental quality. Such environmental quality is also detected in buildings with higher energy efficiency.…”
Section: Fuel Poverty Is Measured Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the results of the online survey, the socio-economic status of a household does not influence the energy efficiency of a building. The main reason for the investment in increased energy efficiency of buildings is lower energy consumption for heating, to which respondents give priority over indoor environmental quality (Recek 2017;Recek et al 2019).…”
Section: Fuel Poverty Is Measured Bymentioning
confidence: 99%