2021
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2021.3067963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indoor Direct Positioning With Imperfect Massive MIMO Array Using Measured Near-Field Channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later, we showed a practical distributed antenna system that is indeed able to reliably locate users based on measured data [10]. Moreover, [7] and [11] show that for an indoor scenario, a distributed antenna deployment increases the localisation accuracy in comparison to co-located systems.…”
Section: A Distributed Localisationmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Later, we showed a practical distributed antenna system that is indeed able to reliably locate users based on measured data [10]. Moreover, [7] and [11] show that for an indoor scenario, a distributed antenna deployment increases the localisation accuracy in comparison to co-located systems.…”
Section: A Distributed Localisationmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…As a result, the calibration accuracy achieved is limited in practise. To combat this, [7] proposes a method to calibrate NF MUSIC using data measured during the dense channel survey presented in Section II.…”
Section: ) End-to-end Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total, the testbed supports up to 128 antennas at the base station and 12 antennas at the user side [47]. The setup has previously been used for the purposes of positioning and communications [48]- [50].…”
Section: The Massive Mimo Testbed a System Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In-situ calibration measures the array error in the actual operating environment using auxiliary calibration sources whose positions, which are also denoted as the CPPs, are known [21]- [27], [29]- [34]. It reaches a reasonable compromise between chamber calibration and self-calibration as it obtains the exact in-field array response with significantly lower complexity and much better accuracy than self-calibration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, other research efforts in counteracting the multipath effect for in-situ calibration include: Pan et al [34], who solve it from the statistical perspective by treating the summation of the multipath components as Gaussian noise based on the Rayleigh fading assumption; and Sippel et al [26], who propose to choose the CPPs within the array's near field to elude multipath effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%