2005
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-005-7146-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indoor Aerosol Particle Deposition in an Empty Office

Abstract: The size-and time-resolved indoor/outdoor aerosol concentration relationships were studied experimentally in an empty office without internal particle sources. Two Scanning Mobility Particle Sizers (SMPS) and an Aerodynamic Particle Sizer (APS) sampled alternately from indoor and outdoor, together covering the size range 3-10,000 nm. The results showed that the indoor aerosol concentration depends mainly on the air exchange and deposition rates, and the outdoor concentration. At higher air exchange rates the i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The range of the overall variation of the indoor BC concentrations mainly depends upon the transport from outdoors through the ventilation process and ranges between 0.027 and 0.072 μg min −1 , while the deposition contributes very little to the variation of the indoor concentrations (within the range 0.004 to 0.029 μg min −1 ). This is in agreement with the findings that are reported by Smolik et al (2005) that the deposition rate of particles in the accumulation mode is almost negligible compared to the values of the air exchange rate. The greater source and sink terms due to transport are observed in RF3 during the warm period apparently due to the high outdoor concentrations (Fig.…”
Section: Quantitative Assessment Of Each Mechanism's Contribution To supporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The range of the overall variation of the indoor BC concentrations mainly depends upon the transport from outdoors through the ventilation process and ranges between 0.027 and 0.072 μg min −1 , while the deposition contributes very little to the variation of the indoor concentrations (within the range 0.004 to 0.029 μg min −1 ). This is in agreement with the findings that are reported by Smolik et al (2005) that the deposition rate of particles in the accumulation mode is almost negligible compared to the values of the air exchange rate. The greater source and sink terms due to transport are observed in RF3 during the warm period apparently due to the high outdoor concentrations (Fig.…”
Section: Quantitative Assessment Of Each Mechanism's Contribution To supporting
confidence: 93%
“…In certain cases, it is assumed that the main processes influencing the change rate of the indoor concentrations are the outdoor pollution, the transport between the indoor and outdoor environments and the deposition on indoor surfaces (Smolik et al 2005;He et al 2005). The pollutant's transport between indoor and outdoor environment is mainly governed by: (a) the ventilation rate, which is measured by the air changes per hour (h −1 ) representing the tightness of the building shell, cracks, etc.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship of indoor and outdoor particulate matter was examined in several environments [27][28][29][30][31][32] and the reported results strongly associated the indoor PM concentration with the outdoor one. In respect to particle dynamics and using mass balance models, the authors managed to determine deposition indoors and penetration from outdoors, although the variability of the results indicated the strong dependence on assumptions, different methodologies and building characteristics [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several studies that tried to determine P and k separately by increasing the indoor PM concentrations significantly. This was achieved either by opening of windows and doors and measurement of subsequent decay of particles indoors after windows and doors were closed (Vette et al, 2001;Chao et al, 2003;Smolík et al, 2005) or by resuspension activities indoors followed again by period of particle decay (Thatcher and Layton, 1995;Thatcher et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%