Abstract:This research is carried out to investigate Indonesian EFL students’ use of self-regulated writing (SRW) strategies and to identify the SRW strategies applied, particularly by proficient students in writing. The research involved 45 students who have passed an essay writing course focusing on expository essays. Data on the students’ use of SRW strategies came from a Self-Regulated Learning Strategy Questionnaire (SRLSQ) adopted from Abadikhah et al. (2018). The students’ use of SRW strategies were categorized … Show more
“…After completing Project-Based Assessment, students have different responses about project based-assessment such as writing is not easy; it is also in accordance with Umamah and Cahyono (2020) quoted from Ferretti & Graham (2019) that writing is a challenging process for students because writing is quite tricky in developing a sentence into an essay. Schleppegrell and Go (2007) also added that writing is difficult, especially for those who are just starting to learn as they express their ideas.…”
Section: Students' Perspective On Project-based Assessment In Writing Classroomsupporting
This study aimed to examine students' perspectives at the university level regarding project-based assessment in writing classes. This research is conduct at one of the universities in Bogor city. Participants in the study numbered eight female students, of whom they had written an academic article before. The method in this study uses qualitative, which uses interviews and documentation in its data collection. The final result obtained is that some students' opinions on project-based assessment include not easy to do, add experience in terms of writing, and take a long time. Benefits of project-based assessment include writing, honing writing skills, and being selective in choosing information—problems faced by students such as lack of time, looking for reference material, and lazy taste.
“…After completing Project-Based Assessment, students have different responses about project based-assessment such as writing is not easy; it is also in accordance with Umamah and Cahyono (2020) quoted from Ferretti & Graham (2019) that writing is a challenging process for students because writing is quite tricky in developing a sentence into an essay. Schleppegrell and Go (2007) also added that writing is difficult, especially for those who are just starting to learn as they express their ideas.…”
Section: Students' Perspective On Project-based Assessment In Writing Classroomsupporting
This study aimed to examine students' perspectives at the university level regarding project-based assessment in writing classes. This research is conduct at one of the universities in Bogor city. Participants in the study numbered eight female students, of whom they had written an academic article before. The method in this study uses qualitative, which uses interviews and documentation in its data collection. The final result obtained is that some students' opinions on project-based assessment include not easy to do, add experience in terms of writing, and take a long time. Benefits of project-based assessment include writing, honing writing skills, and being selective in choosing information—problems faced by students such as lack of time, looking for reference material, and lazy taste.
“…Some EFL students may be less concerned with their language use, particularly in written communication. (Umamah & Cahyono, 2020). However, dealing with English academic writing, especially a dissertation, Paltridge (2004) suggests that students focus on their grammaticality, organization, and arguments.…”
Section: Figure 2 the Ele Students' Srw Strategies Found In The Proce...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-regulated students are those who are metacognitively aware of every process of learning something (Lukes, Jones, & McConnell, 2021;Widharyanto & Binawan, 2020). In the context of higher education, the strategies can allow doctoral students to be more familiar with how to use their cognition, plan their goals, control their emotions, set their environment, and control their motivation in the process of dissertation completion (Abadikhah, Aliyan, & Talebi, 2018;Umamah & Cahyono, 2020). Understanding the use of SRW strategies can assist doctoral students who are in the process of completing their final dissertations in arranging their plans, setting and monitoring targets, organizing emotion, managing the thinking process, and creating environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the importance of SRW strategies, some empirical studies have been conducted to examine the use of the strategies for the completion of tasks (e.g., Abadikhah et al, 2018;Teng & Zhang, 2016;Umamah & Cahyono, 2020). Teng and Zhang (2016) found that the students generally used several SRW strategies to complete their L2 writing tasks, such as idea planning, peer learning, goal-oriented monitoring and evaluating, feedback handling, and self-talk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abadikhah et al (2018) revealed that six dimensions of SRW strategies, namely motive, method, time, physical environment, social environment, and performance were differently used by the students at different proficiency levels. To support this idea, in a recent study, Umamah and Cahyono (2020) also found that students used academic or journal articles as sources to gain their ideas, and in completing their writings, they used other strategies, namely asking for proofreading and revising works.…”
Previous studieshave highlighted the benefits of self-regulated writing (SRW) strategies in the EFL/ESL context. However, little is known about the use of these strategies inthe process of completing a dissertation. Anchored by the limitations of previous studies, this case study aimed to investigate and understand the use of SRW strategies by Indonesian doctoral students majoring in English Language Education. Through purposive sampling, four doctoral students at a public university in Indonesiawere selected as the participants. The data were collected through semi-structured interviews. The qualitative data analysis indicated that the participants used eight SRW strategies, namely idea planning, noticing, text processing, selecting physical environments, seeking social assistance, feedback handling, goal-oriented monitoring and evaluating, and self-talk. This article provided descriptions and explanations of how each strategy was used in the process of completing the participants’ dissertations. The findings of this study also provide pedagogical implications especially in raising doctoral students’ awareness in using SRW strategies as well as contributing to the theoretical development of SRW theory.
Six categories—motivation, method, timing, performance, physical environment, and social environment—are used to classify self-regulated learning (SRL) processes in academic writing. Due to the more difficult academic papers, they must write in English, university students may adopt SRL methods when generating academic writing. Students who are male or female may have various preferences when it comes to using SRL techniques in academic writing. The purpose of this study is to examine the aspect of SRL that English Language Education Department (ELED) students use the most frequently and to determine whether there is a statistically significant difference in the attitudes of male and female ELED students toward the usage of SRL tactics in academic writing. The research design for this study is a survey, and it uses a quantitative methodology. 112 ELED students from the 2019 batch participated in this study and answered the “The six dimensions of SRL in academic writing” questionnaire, which was adapted from Abadikhah, Aliyan, and Talebi (2018). The results showed that students implement all six aspects equally, with the social environment dimension having the highest mean (M=3.76, SD=.60) and the time dimension having the lowest mean (M=3.09, SD=.65). The t-test result is.439. This means that the significance level is less than 0.05 (2-tailed). Therefore, it may be inferred that attitudes concerning the use of SRL methods in academic writing are similar for both male and female students.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.