2013
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3007355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indolcarboxamide Is a Preclinical Candidate for Treating Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis

Abstract: New chemotherapeutic compounds against multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) are urgently needed to combat drug resistance in tuberculosis (TB). We have identified and characterized the indolcarboxamides as a new class of antitubercular bactericidal agent. Genetic and lipid profiling studies identified the likely molecular target of indolcarboxamides as MmpL3, a transporter of trehalose monomycolate that is essential for mycobacterial cell wall biosynthesis. Two lead candidates, NITD-304 and NIT… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
171
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
171
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The identification and characterization of MmpL3 inhibitors have thus far rested on the whole-genome sequencing of spontaneous resistant mutants and the metabolic labeling with [1,2-14 C]acetate of inhibitor-treated cells to monitor the transfer of mycolic acids to their cell envelope acceptors (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)17). Because the development and further optimization of MmpL3 inhibitors would greatly benefit from less cumbersome approaches, and because of the technical difficulty of developing an in vitro transport assay for this protein, we next sought to determine whether the M. tuberculosis mc 2 6206 MmpL3-DUC knockdown could be used in the development of a target-based whole-cell screening assay.…”
Section: Construction Of M Tuberculosis Conditional Mmpl3 Knockdown mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The identification and characterization of MmpL3 inhibitors have thus far rested on the whole-genome sequencing of spontaneous resistant mutants and the metabolic labeling with [1,2-14 C]acetate of inhibitor-treated cells to monitor the transfer of mycolic acids to their cell envelope acceptors (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)17). Because the development and further optimization of MmpL3 inhibitors would greatly benefit from less cumbersome approaches, and because of the technical difficulty of developing an in vitro transport assay for this protein, we next sought to determine whether the M. tuberculosis mc 2 6206 MmpL3-DUC knockdown could be used in the development of a target-based whole-cell screening assay.…”
Section: Construction Of M Tuberculosis Conditional Mmpl3 Knockdown mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether the identified inhibitors inhibit MmpL3 directly or through an indirect mechanism involving the dissipation of the proton motive force from which MmpL3 derives its energy remains to be determined on a case-to-case basis (17,18). Nonetheless, SQ109 is undergoing phase II clinical trials (19), and at least two other series of MmpL3 inhibitors are currently under development for their potential to reduce treatment duration and kill MDR isolates while lacking untoward effects on the human cytochrome P450 enzymes that metabolize antivirals (4,9,13,17,19).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the apparent promiscuity of MmpL3 as a drug target may owe to unusual vulnerability or druggability, the diversity of the chemical scaffolds identified and important differences in their spectra of activity led us to question their direct mechanism of action on the transporter. In particular, the fact that SQ109, BM212, and THPP compounds display inhibitory activity against a broad spectrum of bacterial and fungal pathogens that are devoid of mycolic acids (7,20,21), while AUs and indolecarboxamides specifically target mycobacteria (17,19), suggests that the three first compounds had at least one broader-spectrum target in M. tuberculosis or killed the bacterium through a different mechanism, impacting MmpL3 only indirectly. Another important difference between the MmpL3 inhibitors resides in their activities against nonreplicating M. tuberculosis bacilli.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surprisingly, in the last 2 years, the whole-cell-based screening of compound libraries against M. tuberculosis in culture coupled to the whole-genome sequencing of spontaneous resistant mutants identified a variety of pharmacophores that apparently shared the same mode of action as SQ109. These inhibitors include the 1,5-diarylpyrrole derivative BM212 and analogs (10,11), the benzimidazole C215 (12), tetrahydropyrazolo [1,5-a]pyrimidine-3-carboxamides (THPPs) (13,14), N-benzyl-6=,7=-dihydrospiro[piperidine-4,4=-thieno [3,2-c]pyrans (13), indolecarboxamides (15)(16)(17)(18), and adamantyl ureas (AUs) (19) (Fig. 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%