2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10761-012-0208-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indo-Hispanic Dynamics: From Contact to Colonial Interaction in the Greater Antilles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Building upon the work of other Caribbean historians, ethnographers, and archaeologists that foregrounded the materiality of the encounter (Crosby 1972 ; Hofman and Keehnen 2019 ; Hofman et al. 2014 ; Mann 2011 ; Oliver 2009 ; Ortiz 1995 ; Ostapkowicz 2018 ; Valcárcel Rojas, Samson, and Hoogland 2013 ), one of the aims here is to further our understanding of these entanglements. In particular, this study proposes an entanglement and network approach as a way to construct better informed micro to macro histories in early colonial settings (Hodder and Mol 2016 ).…”
Section: A Materials Encountermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building upon the work of other Caribbean historians, ethnographers, and archaeologists that foregrounded the materiality of the encounter (Crosby 1972 ; Hofman and Keehnen 2019 ; Hofman et al. 2014 ; Mann 2011 ; Oliver 2009 ; Ortiz 1995 ; Ostapkowicz 2018 ; Valcárcel Rojas, Samson, and Hoogland 2013 ), one of the aims here is to further our understanding of these entanglements. In particular, this study proposes an entanglement and network approach as a way to construct better informed micro to macro histories in early colonial settings (Hodder and Mol 2016 ).…”
Section: A Materials Encountermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed analysis of the calibrated radiocarbon dates, including the use of Bayesian modeling, suggests that the dates are concentrated in the contact or early colonial period (Bayliss et al 2012; Valcarcel Rojas 2016:194). Additional evidence that many of the burials date to this period includes the widespread presence of domestic pig ( Sus scrofa ) bones, European pottery, and metal artifacts recovered from graves (Valcárcel Rojas 2016), in addition to the extended supine (Christian-style) placement of the body for many of the burials (Valcárcel Rojas 2012; Valcárcel Rojas et al 2011, 2013).…”
Section: Investigating Indigenous Dietsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the lack of secure chronological indicators of precontact burials, the diverse ethnic and geographical origins observed in the mortuary population (Valcárcel Rojas et al 2011), and taphonomic and demographic indicators that point to catastrophic mortality (Weston and Valcárcel Rojas 2016) suggest that the cemetery itself is predominantly a colonial phenomenon resulting from Indigenous–European interactions; however, the possibility that it could include a small nucleus of precolonial burials cannot be ruled out (Valcárcel Rojas 2016; Weston and Valcárcel Rojas 2016). The indigenous population of the site was rapidly incorporated into the Spanish system ( encomienda ) of forced labor in the first decades of the sixteenth century AD (Valcárcel Rojas 2012, 2016; Valcárcel Rojas et al 2013).…”
Section: Investigating Indigenous Dietsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these called for a more balanced representation with specific emphasis on the roles played by indigenous actors in shaping early colonial material culture. Since then, scholars have advocated the transculturation model, which highlights the bidirectional or multidirectional processes that were involved in the formation of diasporic cultures with entirely new and composite identities (Cusick, 1998;Deagan, 1998Deagan, , 2004Hofman and van Duijvenbode, 2011;Lightfoot, 1995;Valcárcel Rojas et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%