2018
DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(18)30151-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individually shortened duration versus standard duration of elastic compression therapy for prevention of post-thrombotic syndrome: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This strategy proved to be highly efficient as treatment could be stopped at six months in 54.6% of patients and in an additional 10% of patients at 12 months, and this strategy was also demonstrated to be highly cost effective. 210 A practical algorithm to guide contemporary practice regarding use of ECS in DVT is shown in Fig. 3 Recommendation 31…”
Section: Classmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strategy proved to be highly efficient as treatment could be stopped at six months in 54.6% of patients and in an additional 10% of patients at 12 months, and this strategy was also demonstrated to be highly cost effective. 210 A practical algorithm to guide contemporary practice regarding use of ECS in DVT is shown in Fig. 3 Recommendation 31…”
Section: Classmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 A recent trial in patients with acute DVT showed that 16.1% of patients received home care, though this included patients who required home care for the initial compression phase. 18 Finally, a decision regarding ECS therapy duration will be made during regular outpatient clinic visits (only in DVT), whereas ECS therapy is permanent for patients with CVI. ECS therapy is a complex process, with various healthcare professionals and patients collaborate and constantly, purposely or not, adjust their performances to each other and the working conditions (for example, restrictions in time, information or resources).…”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 17 A recent trial in patients with acute DVT showed that 16.1% of patients received home care, though this included patients who required home care for the initial compression phase. 18 Finally, a decision regarding ECS therapy duration will be made during regular outpatient clinic visits (only in DVT), whereas ECS therapy is permanent for patients with CVI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IDEAL-DVT trial showed that an individually shortened duration of ECS therapy based on clinical assessments using the Villalta score was non-inferior to standard ECS treatment duration. The subsequent cost-effectiveness analysis of this trial showed that this new approach was cost effective compared to standard ECS treatment duration [ 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%