2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.05.580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individualizing Risk Prediction for Positive Coronavirus Disease 2019 Testing

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is sweeping the globe. Despite multiple case-series, actionable knowledge to tailor decision-making proactively is missing. RESEARCH QUESTION: Can a statistical model accurately predict infection with COVID-19? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We developed a prospective registry of all patients tested for COVID-19 in Cleveland Clinic to create individualized risk prediction models. We focus here on the likelihood of a positive nasal or oropharyngeal COVID-19 test. A lea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
240
1
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(258 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
7
240
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, other than data on homelessness (0.6% prevalence in our cohort), we did not collect data on the socioeconomic status of the patients. Socioeconomic status is increasingly recognized as an important factor associated with health outcomes in patients with COVID-19 25 and could have influenced our findings with respect to variation in mortality across hospitals. We also did not collect detailed data on ventilator management strategies, hospital or ICU patient volume, or physician and nurse availability.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, other than data on homelessness (0.6% prevalence in our cohort), we did not collect data on the socioeconomic status of the patients. Socioeconomic status is increasingly recognized as an important factor associated with health outcomes in patients with COVID-19 25 and could have influenced our findings with respect to variation in mortality across hospitals. We also did not collect detailed data on ventilator management strategies, hospital or ICU patient volume, or physician and nurse availability.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jehi et al [9] Subjects tested in several clinics in Ohio, USA (n = 11,672) (a) RT-PCR COVID-19 cases were significantly less likely to be vaccinated than controls (p < 0.001) None Subjects tested in several clinics in Florida, USA (n = 2,295) (a) COVID-19 cases were significantly less likely to be vaccinated than controls (p = 0.011)…”
Section: Study Sample Laboratory Methods Main Results Adjustmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, twelve independent articles met all inclusion criteria and were retained ( Figure 1). Seven articles [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] focused on the association between influenza vaccination and the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection (Table 1): these encompassed a total of 242,323 subjects, of which 56.6% were contributed by Pawlowski et al [11] and 32.6% by Vila-Córcoles A et al [12]. Most studies were based on subjects from the general population, except the two smallest studies, which included 203 firefighters and paramedics from the USA [7], and 640 liver transplant patients from Italy [8].…”
Section: Manuscript Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the outcome of being test positive for COVID-19, the propensity score logistic regression model included covariates that were found to be associated with a positive COVID-19 test outcome in our previous work 23. For the outcomes of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) admission of COVID-19 test positive patients, the propensity score covariates are those that…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%