2022
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2022-160215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individualized Treatment-Adjusted Risk Stratification in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We next interrogated the landscape of driver events across the cohorts using a catalog of 91 known genes involved by mutations and focal copy number aberrations derived from de novo driver discovery across 1933 NDMM 29 . We then combined mutations in driver genes with copy number aberrations (CNA; Supplemental Figure 2 ), including known GISTIC hotspots 20, 29 , to define inactivation of tumor suppressor genes ( Supplemental Figure 3, Supplemental Methods ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We next interrogated the landscape of driver events across the cohorts using a catalog of 91 known genes involved by mutations and focal copy number aberrations derived from de novo driver discovery across 1933 NDMM 29 . We then combined mutations in driver genes with copy number aberrations (CNA; Supplemental Figure 2 ), including known GISTIC hotspots 20, 29 , to define inactivation of tumor suppressor genes ( Supplemental Figure 3, Supplemental Methods ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We next interrogated the landscape of driver events across the cohorts using a catalog of 91 known genes involved by mutations and focal copy number aberrations derived from de novo driver discovery across 1933 NDMM 29 . We then combined mutations in driver genes with copy number aberrations (CNA; Supplemental Figure 2 ), including known GISTIC hotspots 20, 29 , to define inactivation of tumor suppressor genes ( Supplemental Figure 3, Supplemental Methods ). Consistent with their later role in MM evolution 16, 30 , a large number of tumor suppressor genes were less frequently inactivated, including CDKN2C, CYLD, TENT5C, FUBP1, MAX, NCOR1, NF1, NFKBIA, PRDM1, RB1, RPL5 , and TRAF3 (p < 0.05; Supplemental Table 3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the article that accompanies this editorial, Maura et al, 1 assisted by artificial intelligence and deep neuronal networks, have introduced the first individualized risk-prediction model for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. This risk-prediction approach is the way forward for the dynamic integration of an ever-widening array of complex genomic, biologic, and soon immunologic features and will permit us to offer patients with myeloma a comprehensive individualized risk prediction adapted to the therapy they will receive.…”
Section: The Takeawaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…that encompasses mutations, mutational signatures, recurrent aneuploidies, and canonical translocations (Methods and Supplemental Table 4). Among the catalogues of 90 nonsynonymous MM driver mutations (Maura et al, 2019a;Maura et al, 2022b;Walker et al, 2018), we found 31 mutated genes in the RRMM patients treated with Dara-Rd (Supplemental Figure 1a). Genes in MAPK pathway (NRAS, KRAS and BRAF) were the most frequently mutated, with 61% of RRMM cases (treated with Dara-Rd) carrying at least one mutation in one of these genes (Supplemental Figure 1a).…”
Section: Genomic Determinant Of Resistance and Progression To Dara-rdmentioning
confidence: 99%