2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jana.2018.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individualized-Targeted Computerized Cognitive Training to Treat HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorder: An Interim Descriptive Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(19 reference statements)
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Study results show that regardless of HIV status, older adults who participated in CCRT showed improvements of at least modest clinical importance in tests of executive function (verbal fluency) and verbal learning/memory (interference list and delayed recall) relative to the control group. These preliminary findings of neurocognitive benefits of modest clinical importance in some cognitive domains are consistent with previous reports of CCRT-related neurocognitive benefit in healthy older individuals [34], older adults with HIV infection [35][36][37][38], and older individuals with mild cognitive impairment [39]. Specifically, among healthy older Americans (mean age = 69, SD = 6.9), CCRT targeting auditory perception and visuomotor/working memory domains of cognition was associated with post-training improvements in tests of everyday problem solving, working memory and matrix reasoning [34].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Study results show that regardless of HIV status, older adults who participated in CCRT showed improvements of at least modest clinical importance in tests of executive function (verbal fluency) and verbal learning/memory (interference list and delayed recall) relative to the control group. These preliminary findings of neurocognitive benefits of modest clinical importance in some cognitive domains are consistent with previous reports of CCRT-related neurocognitive benefit in healthy older individuals [34], older adults with HIV infection [35][36][37][38], and older individuals with mild cognitive impairment [39]. Specifically, among healthy older Americans (mean age = 69, SD = 6.9), CCRT targeting auditory perception and visuomotor/working memory domains of cognition was associated with post-training improvements in tests of everyday problem solving, working memory and matrix reasoning [34].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…To address this, a cognitive training algorithm was created that theoretically would best target the cognitive domains needed to reverse a HAND diagnosis. Thus, the three-step Individualized-Targeted Cognitive Training Framework (Vance et al, 2018b) was created. In Step one, if cognitive impairments were detected in either SOP and/or attention, participants were automatically assigned cognitive training in these domains.…”
Section: Procedures/treatment Design and Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be attributable to the CRGT model of administering these interventions together, in a group setting. BTA has been delivered as a predominantly individual intervention 25 , whereby brain training software or activity books are given to people individually with the expectation that they will practice in isolation 46 . This passive approach leads to high drop-off rates; while completers receive the self-reported coping benefit discussed above, upwards of half of a BTA trial's participants do not adhere to the training regimen as prescribed [23][24][25] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%