2004
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2004.12.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individualized Patient Dosing in Phase I Clinical Trials: The Role of Escalation With Overdose Control in PNU-214936

Abstract: EWOC determined phase I doses of PNU-214936 that were adjusted for patient anti-SEA antibody level, while safeguarding against overdose. Furthermore, the method permitted the construction of a dosing algorithm that would allow patients in subsequent clinical investigations to be treated with a dose of PNU-214936 that is tailored to their specific tolerance for the agent, as reflected by their pretreatment anti-SEA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anti-SEA titres determined at each study visit (Table 2) were similar to previous studies (Cheng et al, 2004). There was a 536-fold increase in median titre following the first cycle but this was not boosted by further drug exposure and generally declined after the second cycle.…”
Section: Safety and Immunological Responsesupporting
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Anti-SEA titres determined at each study visit (Table 2) were similar to previous studies (Cheng et al, 2004). There was a 536-fold increase in median titre following the first cycle but this was not boosted by further drug exposure and generally declined after the second cycle.…”
Section: Safety and Immunological Responsesupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In previous studies (Alpaugh et al, 1998b;Cheng et al, 2004), the occurrence of high-systemic levels of IL-2 correlated with toxicity. In the present study, post-infusion IL-2 levels were measured on the first 2 days of treatment as this coincided with the majority of AEs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[5][6][7] Superantigen-based antitumor strategies may offer therapeutic promise. 8,9 However, in vivo administration of intact superantigen in sufficient therapeutic amounts risks unwanted cytotoxicity against normal cells because superantigens preferentially direct cytotoxicity against MHC II-positive cells. Therefore, successful employment of superantigen in tumor immunotherapy requires targeting superantigen to the site of tumor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%