2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individualized cumulative cisplatin dose for locoregionally-advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients receiving induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intensive treatments, such as targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and adjuvant therapy, may not produce survival benefits but increase the risk of toxicity and the economic burden. Moreover, a previous study has confirmed that a higher cumulative cisplatin dose during CCRT was not superior to a lower one in terms of survival for LA-NPC patients in the low-risk group with a smaller post-IC tumor volume or undetectable post-IC EBV DNA (37,38). As a result, for these patients, screening needs to be early and the intensity of treatment can be reduced to avoid unnecessary toxicities and costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Intensive treatments, such as targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and adjuvant therapy, may not produce survival benefits but increase the risk of toxicity and the economic burden. Moreover, a previous study has confirmed that a higher cumulative cisplatin dose during CCRT was not superior to a lower one in terms of survival for LA-NPC patients in the low-risk group with a smaller post-IC tumor volume or undetectable post-IC EBV DNA (37,38). As a result, for these patients, screening needs to be early and the intensity of treatment can be reduced to avoid unnecessary toxicities and costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Wen et al. demonstrated that high-risk patients with advanced T or N stage, higher pre-DNA or larger post-IC tumor volume benefited from CCD ≥ 200 mg/m 2 for PFS and DMFS ( 37 ). A previous study also showed that patients with detectable post-DNA showed significantly improved 3-year PFS and LRFS by receiving ≥ 160 mg/m 2 CCD ( 38 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies showed that the CCD of CCRT after IC was not an independent prognostic factor for OS. 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 However, a dose of CCD ≥200 mg/m 2 had the trend to prolong OS benefit in those with an unfavorable response to IC. In our study, we did not observe a statistically significant difference in OS between de novo mNPC patients treated with radiotherapy alone versus concomitant chemoradiotherapy after first-line chemotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,123,143 If IC is given in addition to CCRT, retrospective data show that the cumulative cisplatin dose needed in CCRT phase is typically 160 mg/m 2 on the basis of patient tolerance of cumulative cisplatin. [144][145][146] For patients in whom cisplatin is contraindicated, other alternative concurrent agents include carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] 5-6), 87,94,147 oxaliplatin (70 mg/m 2 weekly), 97 and nedaplatin (100 mg/m 2 triweekly). 56 If platinum-based chemotherapy is contraindicated, fluoropyrimidines such as UFT (uracil and tegafur in a 4:1 M ratio) 101 may also be offered as an option.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Studies Identified In the Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%