2022
DOI: 10.3390/s22041331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individualization of Pinus radiata Canopy from 3D UAV Dense Point Clouds Using Color Vegetation Indices

Abstract: The location of trees and the individualization of their canopies are important parameters to estimate diameter, height, and biomass, among other variables. The very high spatial resolution of UAV imagery supports these processes. A dense 3D point cloud is generated from RGB UAV images, which is used to obtain a digital elevation model (DEM). From this DEM, a canopy height model (CHM) is derived for individual tree identification. Although the results are satisfactory, the quality of this detection is reduced … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also faces difficulties in capturing accurate DTMs in areas with dense vegetation [18]. Methods for generating DTMs from point clouds can be broadly classified into morphological filtering methods [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29], vegetation index-based methods [30][31][32][33][34], composite methods [35][36][37][38], and machine learning-based methods [39][40][41] [35] effectively removed vegetation in steep and rugged terrains using morphological filters such as Progressive Morphological Filter (PMF), Simple Morphological Filter (SMRF), Cloth Simulation Filter (CSF), Adaptive Triangular Irregular Network (ATIN), and CAractérisation de NUages de POints (CANUPO). [42] achieved vegetation removal using CSF and ATIN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also faces difficulties in capturing accurate DTMs in areas with dense vegetation [18]. Methods for generating DTMs from point clouds can be broadly classified into morphological filtering methods [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29], vegetation index-based methods [30][31][32][33][34], composite methods [35][36][37][38], and machine learning-based methods [39][40][41] [35] effectively removed vegetation in steep and rugged terrains using morphological filters such as Progressive Morphological Filter (PMF), Simple Morphological Filter (SMRF), Cloth Simulation Filter (CSF), Adaptive Triangular Irregular Network (ATIN), and CAractérisation de NUages de POints (CANUPO). [42] achieved vegetation removal using CSF and ATIN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Booth et al [14] achieved 97% classification accuracy rate in landslide mapping by using spectrum-based methods and filtering unwanted non-native features with the assumption that they exhibit higher spatial frequency. Considerable progress has been achieved in the active field of vegetation suppression within geospatial models, which includes colour-based and slope-based filtering techniques [15][16][17][18], with commercial software integrating proprietary algorithms specifically designed for vegetation filtering in ground terrain elevation [19]. However, in specialised applications, the necessity arises for employing highly specific processing strategies, including multiple stages of filtering [15,17,18,20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%