Individualistic species limitations of climate‐induced range expansions generated by meso‐scale dispersal barriers

Abstract

Aim Evidence indicates that species are responding to climate change through distributional range shifts that track suitable climatic conditions. We aim to elucidate the role of meso‐scale dispersal barriers in climate‐tracking responses. Location South coast of England (the English Channel). Methods Historical distributional data of four intertidal invertebrate species were logistically regressed against sea surface temperature (SST) to determine a climate envelope. This envelope was used to estimate the expected climate‐tracking response since 1990 along the coast, which was compared with observed range expansions. A hydrodynamic modelling approach was used to identify dispersal barriers and explore disparities between expected and observed climate tracking. Results Range shifts detected by field survey over the past 20 years were less than those predicted by the changes that have occurred in SST. Hydrodynamic model simulations indicated that physical barriers produced by complex tidal currents have variably restricted dispersal of pelagic larvae amongst the four species. Main conclusions We provide the first evidence that meso‐scale hydrodynamic barriers have limited climate‐induced range shifts and demonstrate that life history traits affect the ability of species to overcome such barriers. This suggests that current forecasts may be flawed, both by overestimating range shifts and by underestimating climatic tolerances of species. This has implications for our understanding of climate change impacts on global biodiversity.

Faunal breaks and species composition of Indo-Pacific corals: the role of plate tectonics, environment and habitat distribution

“…However, transient non-equilibrium dynamics can result in mismatches between present-day abiotic conditions and species distributions (e.g. lags in ongoing species range shifts in response to anthropogenic climate change [19,20]). Consequently, explanations for species distributions may require consideration of historical processes as well as contemporary environmental conditions.…”

Similar but not equivalent: ecological niche comparison across closely–related Mexican white pines

“…2f). For P. lambertiana, these areas might not yet been populated because of the long distance to the main distributional range in California (Kinloch & Dulitz, 1990), or given any restricting biological interactions and environmental or anthropogenic barriers (Pearson & Dawson, 2003;Keith et al, 2011).…”

Temperate macroalgae impacts tropical fish recruitment at forefronts of range expansion

“…Nevertheless, factors that regulate the colonisation of new ranges are largely unresolved (Hellmann et al 2012;HilleRisLambers et al 2013;Urban et al 2013). Certainly, supply of larval propagules into new ranges (Gaylord and Gaines 2000;Keith et al 2011) and climate at higher latitudes (Pinsky et al 2013) may primarily determine how species respond to shifting isotherms. However, for reef-associated organisms,…”