2019
DOI: 10.1080/13691457.2019.1696755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individualising or categorising recognition? Conceptual discussions concerning the relationship between foster children and their child welfare workers

Abstract: som ett fullgott analytiskt verktyg i förståelsen av den specifika kontexten. Artikeln problematiserar Honneths syn på barndom samt hans förståelse av ömsesidighet i omsorgsrelationer. Särskilt fokuseras Honneths dikotomi mellan erkännande och misskännande när det gäller rättsligt erkännande. Teoretiska och konceptuella diskussioner presenteras som betonar att motsatsen till rättsligt misskännande bör, inom denna kontext, förstås som en dikotomi mellan kategoriserande eller individualiserande erkännande.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The institutionalized role may reduce the child welfare officer to an official authority figure as Natalie stated (cf. Lindahl 2019). The interaction that Emily recalled made her feel acknowledged and can be interpreted as mutual recognition in terms of affection.…”
Section: The Importance Of Interactions With Professionalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The institutionalized role may reduce the child welfare officer to an official authority figure as Natalie stated (cf. Lindahl 2019). The interaction that Emily recalled made her feel acknowledged and can be interpreted as mutual recognition in terms of affection.…”
Section: The Importance Of Interactions With Professionalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recognition theory is therefore well suited to challenge 'a social work of personalization' (Houston 2010, 848). Mutuality means that recognition in the form of love, rights or solidarity cannot only be a matter of receiving; it also involves giving (Lindahl 2019;cf. Warming 2015).…”
Section: Recognition As a Theoretical Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations