2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2013.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual variations in the micronucleus assay for biological dosimetry after high dose exposure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
22
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
8
22
2
Order By: Relevance
“…6D) increased and was sufficiently separated at 6, 8 and 10 Gy. This increase, which is also in agreement with the results available in the literature (36, 42, 48), could indicate the delay in cell cycle progression in the presence of DNA damage, which influences the production of BN cells. The monotonically increasing dose dependence of the ratio of mononucleated to binucleated lymphocytes confirms that this endpoint could be taken into account as an additional parameter for dose-assessment purposes at higher doses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6D) increased and was sufficiently separated at 6, 8 and 10 Gy. This increase, which is also in agreement with the results available in the literature (36, 42, 48), could indicate the delay in cell cycle progression in the presence of DNA damage, which influences the production of BN cells. The monotonically increasing dose dependence of the ratio of mononucleated to binucleated lymphocytes confirms that this endpoint could be taken into account as an additional parameter for dose-assessment purposes at higher doses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This variability could reasonably be anticipated. It is well know that there exists a considerable variation in the baseline micronuclei frequency and acute radiosensitivity (4648). In part this is due to variations in demographics, such as age, gender (46), smoking status, occupational exposure (49), as well as health status (50).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of MN per BNC as a function of dose demonstrates some variability between donors. This variability in the CBMN assay has been well documented in the literature and Kacprzak et al showed that for five donors, the rate of MN per 1,000 BNC was relatively consistent at 0 Gy but had an approximate range of 0.2‐0.6 at 5 Gy. While the variability between donors across the dose range has been reduced in this work to 15% compared to 26% in our previous analysis template , the need for generating a calibration curve that is based on the rate of MN per BNC from multiple donors is demonstrated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…In addition to the 72 h culture time requirement, typical standard CBMN protocols involve culturing 500 mL to 2 mL of peripheral blood in a large volume of culture medium (5-20 mL) (McNamee et al 2009;IAEA 2011;Kacprzak et al 2013;Lyulko et al 2014). A reduction in the initial blood culture volume may eliminate the need for peripheral blood sampling by venipuncture, which is invasive and may not be possible depending on the nature of the emergency and the state of the patient.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%