2015
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhv239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual Variability of the System-Level Organization of the Human Brain

Abstract: Recent functional magnetic resonance imaging-based resting-state functional connectivity analyses of group average data have characterized large-scale systems that represent a high level in the organizational hierarchy of the human brain. These systems are likely to vary spatially across individuals, even after anatomical alignment, but the characteristics of this variance are unknown. Here, we characterized large-scale brain systems across two independent datasets of young adults. In these individuals, we wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

26
268
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(303 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
26
268
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, 2015), limiting some potential applications. Since GPIP adapts an initial atlas to individual resting fMRI data, it is unable to identify functional variability that is systemically absent from the group atlas (Laumann et al ., 2016; Gordon et al ., 2015; Mueller et al ., 2013). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, 2015), limiting some potential applications. Since GPIP adapts an initial atlas to individual resting fMRI data, it is unable to identify functional variability that is systemically absent from the group atlas (Laumann et al ., 2016; Gordon et al ., 2015; Mueller et al ., 2013). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is well known that architectonic boundaries and regions of functional specialization do not align precisely with macroscopic morphological features (Brodmann, 1909; von Economo and Koskinas, 1925; Zilles and Amunts, 2010; Amunts et al ., 1999; Penfield and Rasmussen, 1950; Honey et al ., 2009; Gordon et al ., 2015). As a result, a common parcellation will invariably result in errors in defining functionally specialized regions when these areas are mapped back from the atlas to the individual.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We next examined the extent to which the principal gradient captures the macroscale layout of intrinsic functional connectivity networks. Despite the high reproducibility of largescale resting-state networks (1,(44)(45)(46), there is no clear overarching spatial schema to explain the transition of one network to another. We examined the widely used seven-network parcellation by Yeo et al (2) with respect to the position of each network along the principal gradient (Fig.…”
Section: The Principal Gradient Captures the Spatial Layout Of Large-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This cortical functional parcellation varies substantially across different individuals [7][8][9]. Nevertheless, approaches to defining these are still under development or in early validation stages; neuroimaging studies of brain networks typically still address parcellation at a group level [10], ignoring explicit representations of individual-level variations in parcellations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dhillon et al proposed an individual sparse PCA with spatial anatomical priors [33]. Gordon et al developed a procedure to match each cortical vertex in each subject to a group averaged parcellation template using the similarity of connectivity profiles [8]. Wang et al designed another group template matching method based on the similarity of BOLD signals, in which the template is updated with each iteration [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%