2012
DOI: 10.3390/insects3041143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual Variability of Nosema ceranae Infections in Apis mellifera Colonies

Abstract: Since 2006, beekeepers have reported increased losses of Apis mellifera colonies, and one factor that has been potentially implicated in these losses is the microsporidian Nosema ceranae. Since N. ceranae is a fairly recently discovered parasite, there is little knowledge of the variation in infection levels among individual workers within a colony. In this study we examined the levels of infection in individual bees from five colonies over three seasons using both spore counting and quantitative real-time PCR… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
13
0
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(89 reference statements)
4
13
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The amount of DWV had been previously determined from a pooled sample of 30 bees and the DC T values were used as an indication of viral load in each colony (for details see Martin et al, 2012). Our N. ceranae spore counts were based on pooled samples of 20 bees using the standard methods and were highly variable between colonies, as is typical for this species (Meana et al, 2010;Mulholland et al, 2012), but no significant difference (Kruskal-Wallis, d.f. = 3, H = 1.37, P = 0.7) was detected between the four islands.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of DWV had been previously determined from a pooled sample of 30 bees and the DC T values were used as an indication of viral load in each colony (for details see Martin et al, 2012). Our N. ceranae spore counts were based on pooled samples of 20 bees using the standard methods and were highly variable between colonies, as is typical for this species (Meana et al, 2010;Mulholland et al, 2012), but no significant difference (Kruskal-Wallis, d.f. = 3, H = 1.37, P = 0.7) was detected between the four islands.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…may lie in inherent host subspecific differences. For example, experiments in Spain are conducted using A. mellifera iberiensis ) while A. mellifera mellifera , A. mellifera carnica or Buckfast (a cross of many subspecies) are usually tested in central and northern Europe (Mulholland et al 2012;Fontbonne et al 2013;Francis et al 2014). However, recent studies suggest that genetic variation among individual bees or colonies within a subspecies-and not between subspecies-is a better predictor of host response to N. ceranae (Fontbonne et al 2013;Francis et al 2014;Meixner et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussion/conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the first centrifugation in the phenol/chloroform DNA extraction, the organic phase was solubilized with 95 % ethanol so that a spore count could be performed for each bee (Mulholland et al 2012). This modification was performed so that the genomic data for each bee could be compared to the spore count data of the same individual.…”
Section: Genomic Dna Extraction and Real-time Pcrmentioning
confidence: 99%