2012
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1113148109
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual variability in functional connectivity predicts performance of a perceptual task

Abstract: People differ in their ability to perform novel perceptual tasks, both during initial exposure and in the rate of improvement with practice. It is also known that regions of the brain recruited by particular tasks change their activity during learning. Here we investigate neural signals predictive of individual variability in performance. We used resting-state functional MRI to assess functional connectivity before training on a novel visual discrimination task. Subsequent task performance was related to funct… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

24
177
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 244 publications
(201 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
24
177
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These changes in rs-FC may reflect intrinsic and stable modifications related to vocabulary learning. This result agrees with previous studies showing that training in specific functions increased FC between local and distant brain areas involved in learning a new task (Lewis et al 2009;Baldassarre et al 2012;Ventura-Campos et al 2013). Therefore spontaneous activity patterns in the rs-fMRI may reflect a priori biases and the individual's propensities as a result of experience (Harmelech and Malach 2013).…”
Section: -Relationship Between Auditory and Motor Regions At Restsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These changes in rs-FC may reflect intrinsic and stable modifications related to vocabulary learning. This result agrees with previous studies showing that training in specific functions increased FC between local and distant brain areas involved in learning a new task (Lewis et al 2009;Baldassarre et al 2012;Ventura-Campos et al 2013). Therefore spontaneous activity patterns in the rs-fMRI may reflect a priori biases and the individual's propensities as a result of experience (Harmelech and Malach 2013).…”
Section: -Relationship Between Auditory and Motor Regions At Restsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Previous studies have shown that the intensity of correlations within and between brain areas at rest has behavioral significance (Harmelech and Malach 2013;Guerra-Carrillo et al 2014;Finn et al 2015), and that the resting-state activity may reflect the repeated history of co-activation within or between brain regions, which may in turn be a predictor of individual differences while performing perceptual, intelligence, and memory tasks (Lewis et al 2009;Baldassarre et al 2012;Cole et al 2012;Ventura-Campos et al 2013;Bueichekú et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies rated the complexity or novelty of improvised musical [Bengtsson et al, 2007; Villarreal et al, 2013] or literary material [Liu et al, 2012; Shah et al, 2013] and correlated these measures with the amplitude of brain activity. Other studies utilizing sensorimotor tasks [Baldassarre et al, 2012; Koyama et al, 2011] have suggested that performance is strongly associated with functional connections between brain regions. Such relationships have rarely been examined in the domain of creativity before and their interactions with expertise or with different phases of the creative process are unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Furthermore, the coordination of brain activity between disparate brain subnetworks is a dynamic and taskdependent process. [7][8][9][10] Temporal dynamic interactions within brain subnetworks play an important role in supporting brain information processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%