2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual personality does not predict learning performance in a foraging context in female guppies, Poecilia reticulata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Females are again faster to eat than males, and both sexes improve average performance over successive trials, suggesting that training of the colour signalfood reward association was successful. While not a specific objective of our study, this result contributes to the growing literature on associative learning in guppies (Kniel et al, 2020;Lucon-Xiccato & Bisazza, 2017b;Trompf & Brown, 2014). Individual fish also vary, both in training trial performance overall (averaged across trials) and in the rate of improvement, and in learning [following e.g., (Langley et al, 2020)] across trials.…”
Section: Variation In Training Performancementioning
confidence: 63%
“…Females are again faster to eat than males, and both sexes improve average performance over successive trials, suggesting that training of the colour signalfood reward association was successful. While not a specific objective of our study, this result contributes to the growing literature on associative learning in guppies (Kniel et al, 2020;Lucon-Xiccato & Bisazza, 2017b;Trompf & Brown, 2014). Individual fish also vary, both in training trial performance overall (averaged across trials) and in the rate of improvement, and in learning [following e.g., (Langley et al, 2020)] across trials.…”
Section: Variation In Training Performancementioning
confidence: 63%
“…Similarly, in guppies, more sociable individuals performed poorly in a shoal size discrimination task (Lucon-Xiccato and Dadda, 2017). However, other studies have indicated that there is no effect of personality on cognitive performance in female guppies tested in a foraging learning task (Kniel et al, 2020). Even if there is no direct effect of personality on cognitive ability, similar factors (such as size and sex) influence both kinds of behavior, which might result in correlated patterns (Barber et al, 2017;Jacquin et al, 2020), indicating that even if personality does not affect cognitive performance, the two behaviors are likely to covary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among-individual variation is also found across different cognitive domains (e.g. spatial memory (Sonnenberg et al, 2019); association learning (Kniel et al, 2020), problem solving (van Horik et al, 2019)), though relatively few studies have characterised the among-individual covariance (or correlation) structure between these. This is important to do because trade-offs between domains have been hypothesised to maintain cognitive variation (Del Giudice et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among-individual variation is also found across different aspect of cognition (e.g. spatial memory (Sonnenberg et al, 2019); association learning (Kniel et al, 2020), inhibitory control (Brandão et al, 2019)). Although numerous studies have explored relationships between cognitive performance in different cognitive tasks (for a review see Burkart et al, 2017; Boogert et al, 2018), relatively few studies have characterised the among-individual covariance (or correlation) structure between these.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation