2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual pension risk preference elicitation and collective asset allocation with heterogeneity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will use this minimum acceptable coverage rate as the point of discontinuity for a pension fund. When we instead use a power utility function 7 with the average risk aversion r = 1.92 (Alserda et al, 2016), we find a slightly higher average minimum acceptable coverage rate of 93.6%. Incorporating variation in horizon and risk aversion will again give a lower coverage rate, at which point nobody is willing to join the pension fund.…”
Section: Occurrence Of Discontinuity Eventsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We will use this minimum acceptable coverage rate as the point of discontinuity for a pension fund. When we instead use a power utility function 7 with the average risk aversion r = 1.92 (Alserda et al, 2016), we find a slightly higher average minimum acceptable coverage rate of 93.6%. Incorporating variation in horizon and risk aversion will again give a lower coverage rate, at which point nobody is willing to join the pension fund.…”
Section: Occurrence Of Discontinuity Eventsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Individual plans may have particular value by allowing for customizing the plan to individual preferences and time to retirement (i.e., lifecycles). The value of the individual plan (compared with the collective plan) will therefore be more attractive than in our model (see, for example, Alserda et al (2016)).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations