1988
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-3472(88)80117-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual odours and mate recognition in the prairie vole, Microtus ochrogaster

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scent marks of males may also be used for mate selection and mate recognition, as has been shown in rodents (Newman and Tang Halpin, 1988;Tang-Maninez et al, 1993;Johnston and Jemigan, 1994). Cantoni and Rivier (1992) found that few compounds detected by gas chromatography were common to different individual male C. russula.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scent marks of males may also be used for mate selection and mate recognition, as has been shown in rodents (Newman and Tang Halpin, 1988;Tang-Maninez et al, 1993;Johnston and Jemigan, 1994). Cantoni and Rivier (1992) found that few compounds detected by gas chromatography were common to different individual male C. russula.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carr et al (1979Carr et al ( , 1980 showed for monogamous rats that pair-bonded females significantly prefer the odour of their male partner to that of a stranger, in contrast with polygamous rats (Carr et al 1979), whereas male pair-bonded rats prefer the odour of a female stranger over that of their female partner (Carr 1980). Regarding voles, Newman and Halpin (1988) reported a significant preference of M. ochrogaster pair-bonded females for cues from their partner, irrespective of the sexual status of the animal stranger. Conversely, whereas males significantly preferred their female partner to a sexually experienced female, no significant preference could be distinguished when males were tested with their partner and sexually naive female odour cues (Newman and Halpin 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Regarding voles, Newman and Halpin (1988) reported a significant preference of M. ochrogaster pair-bonded females for cues from their partner, irrespective of the sexual status of the animal stranger. Conversely, whereas males significantly preferred their female partner to a sexually experienced female, no significant preference could be distinguished when males were tested with their partner and sexually naive female odour cues (Newman and Halpin 1988). Moreover, DeVries and Carter (1999) revealed that female M. ochrogaster formed partner preferences more quickly than males, and that this preference was longer-lasting, indicating sexual dimorphism in the development and maintenance of social preferences, probably as a result of different reproductive strategies of the sexes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ability to use olfactory information for communication is reported for many surface-dwelling and semi-subterranean rodents (eg Bowers and Alexander 1967, Brown 1985, Halpin 1986). These olfactory cues are recognized mediating many social interactions, territory defense, and mating (eg Newman and Halpin 1988, Randall 1989, Murdock and Randall 2001. In the case of solitary subterranean rodents, information about chemical communication is mainly restricted to mole rats S. ehrenbergi for which it is known that they can discriminate individuals, sex, reproductive condition, and species by means of odour cues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%