See related article, pp 161-166 S ocioeconomic status (SES) is a known risk factor for cardiovascular disease. 1,2 However, unlike traditional Framingham risk factors, SES does not directly impact the cardiovascular system but exerts its cardiovascular effects via a complex interaction of biobehavioral factors, such as exercise and diet (Figure). Because these mediating behavioral factors are potentially modifiable, elucidating the pathways by which SES influences cardiovascular disease offers important opportunities for preventive interventions that may, in turn, help to address health disparities among social groups.It was toward this aim of understanding the role of mediating factors in the association between SES and hypertension that Brummett et al 3 conducted a large cross-sectional study using data from Wave IV (2007)(2008)(2009)) of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Using path models, they found that, in 14 299 "nationally representative" Americans aged 24 to 35 years: (1) higher household income and being married were independently associated with lower systolic blood pressure (SBP), whereas older age, male sex, black ethnicity, higher body mass index (BMI), greater waist circumference, smoking, and higher alcohol intake were independently associated with higher SBP in multivariable modeling; (2) higher household income was associated with lower SBP by way of lower resting heart rate (offsetting the SBP-raising effects of increased alcohol consumption) and remained inversely associated with SBP even after adjusting for all measured covariates, and, in fact, each $50 000 increase was related to a decrease in SBP of 0.61 mm Hg; and (3) higher education level was similarly associated with lower SBP by way of lower BMI, smaller waist circumference, and lower resting heart rate, but was no longer significantly related to SBP after accounting for these indirect effects. The authors concluded that increased BMI, particularly central obesity, and higher resting heart rate were important mediators of the association between lower SES and higher SBP.That obesity emerged as a chief link between lower educational status and higher SBP ( Figure) in the study by Brummett et al 3 may not be surprising at first glance-the association of lower SES with higher BMI and higher SBP has been observed in other developed countries 1,4 and has been attributed to lack of knowledge regarding dietary choices, lack of access to healthy foods in lower SES areas, 5 poorer weight management skills, or differing social norms related to body size. 6 However, the findings of Brummett et al 3 are striking when one takes into account how young the American National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health sample was (all in their 20s and early 30s): the majority (Ͼ60%) of these young adults were prehypertensive (SBP Ͼ120 mm Hg) or overweight (BMI Ͼ25 kg/m 2 ), whereas Ͼ1 in 10 were hypertensive (SBP Ͼ140 mm Hg) and Ͼ1 in 3 obese (BMI Ͼ30 kg/m 2 ). 3 Furthermore, whereas the current results were limited to cross-sectional...