1979
DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.2665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual mercury exposure of chloralkali workers and its relation to blood and urinary mercury levels.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(13 reference statements)
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For studies in which the data were scanned, the previously reported slopes were well within the 95% confidence interval of that calculated from the digitized data. For the studies that did not require digitizing, we obtained virtually the same result (i.e., correlation coefficient, slope, and intercept) for Mattiussi et al (1982), but not for the two Lindstedt et al (1979) studies. Because Lindstedt et al (1979) reported the raw data, this difference is not due to inaccuracies in imaging the data but may be due to differences in statistical methods or reporting errors.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For studies in which the data were scanned, the previously reported slopes were well within the 95% confidence interval of that calculated from the digitized data. For the studies that did not require digitizing, we obtained virtually the same result (i.e., correlation coefficient, slope, and intercept) for Mattiussi et al (1982), but not for the two Lindstedt et al (1979) studies. Because Lindstedt et al (1979) reported the raw data, this difference is not due to inaccuracies in imaging the data but may be due to differences in statistical methods or reporting errors.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Seven studies had data in the range of 3-25 µg/m 3 , for a total of 52 data points in this range (Table 3). Mattiussi et al (1982), Muller et al (1980), and the two studies by Lindstedt et al (1979) reported raw numerical data for mercury in air and urine. Data from the other studies in the combined analysis were reported in graphical form only.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To our knowledge, this is the highest Hg concentration in urine ever reported, being about 90-fold higher than the health-based occupational exposure limit level (50 μg/g creatinine) set by WHO (6). From the previous studies, the ratio between Hg concentration in urine (μg/L or μg/g creatinine) and Hg concentration in air (μg/m 3 ) was 1-3 (11,(18)(19)(20)(21). From this ratio, the Hg level in the air of the working environment was estimated to range from about 3 hundreds to 1 thousands μg/m 3 in average.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%