Individual-level socioeconomic status and contact or familiarity with people with mental illness: a cross-sectional study in Wuhou District, Chengdu, Southwest China

Abstract

Background People with mental illness (PWMI) often suffer from public stigma, which can make them unwilling to seek help and reduce access to early treatment. The aims of this study were to determine attitudes towards PWMI among the general public in a Chinese sample and to explore the relationships with sociodemographic characteristics. Methods A community-based, cross-sectional study was conducted from March to June 2019. The participants’ attitudes towards PWMI were evaluated by the Chinese version of the Social Distance Scale (SDSC). An independent-sample T-test and one-way ANOVA were used to determine the association of categorical variables with the outcome variable. Multiple linear regression and Spearman correlations were computed to explore the correlation between SDSC scores and individual-level socioeconomic status (SES). Results A total of 1437 participants were recruited, and their total SDSC score was 12.53 (SD: 3.11). Univariate analysis results showed that age, education level, educational attainment, and individual-level SES as well as whether they were caregivers/family members of PWMI were correlated with SDSC scores. The results of regression analysis showed a significant effect caused by contact or familiarity with PWMI (B = -1.134, β = -.190, P < 0.001), as well as for individual-level SES (B = -.339, β = -.110, P < 0.001). Spearman correlation results showed that SDSC scores were negatively correlated with individual-level SES (r = -.078, p < 0.01) and contact or familiarity with PWMI (r = -.168, p < 0.001). Conclusion This study reveals that public stigma towards PWMI is common in Southwest China. Individuals who are not a family member or a caregiver of PWMI or have low education level or low individual-level SES need to be provided more anti-stigma interventions. Contacting with PWMI is also a potentially beneficial measure to reduce social distance.

The socioeconomic context of stigma: examining the relationship between economic conditions and attitudes towards people with mental illness across European countries

“…Those in the worst financial position were 1.52 (1.37, 1.68) times more likely to report difficulty talking to a person with mental illness than those in the most secure financial position. More recent research from both the UK and China finds a similar association between lower socioeconomic status and a greater desire for social distance from people experiencing mental health problems (34,35).…”

Association Between Familiarity with Mental Disorders and Stigma Discrimination Related to Mental Disorders Among Colombian Students

“…Generally, people with more years of age, female gender, and higher income show a more favorable attitude towards people with mental disorders. 19 , 20 , 35 , 36 It is necessary to consider especially low- and middle-income countries, such as Colombia, because poverty and inequity are a syndemic favoring SDRMD. In these countries, there is a high frequency of people with little formal education, people with mental health illiteracy, and people living with mental disorders without access to health services, to the point that low- and middle-income countries account for 80% of the mental health disease burden worldwide.…”

Mental illness stigma in Bangladesh: Findings from a cross-sectional survey

“…SES has been shown to be associated with mental illness stigma (Wang et al, 2021 ; Foster and O’Mealey, 2022 ). The results of the study suggested that participants with middle SES tend to have more stigma as evident in other Asian countries such as Pakistan, India, and China (Knifton, 2012 ).…”