2014
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1321842111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual letters of the RNA polymerase II CTD code govern distinct gene expression programs in fission yeast

Abstract: The primary structure and phosphorylation pattern of the tandem Y 1 S 2 P 3 T 4 S 5 P 6 S 7 repeats of the RNA polymerase II carboxyl-terminal domain (CTD) comprise an informational code that coordinates transcription, chromatin modification, and RNA processing. To gauge the contributions of individual CTD coding "letters" to gene expression, we analyzed the poly(A) + transcriptomes of fission yeast mutants that lack each of the four inessential CTD phosphoacceptors: Tyr1, Ser2, Thr4, and Ser7. There was a hie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
80
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
9
80
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Publicly available data sets were downloaded from GEO, SRA, or ArrayExpress repositories (accessions indicated in Supplemental Table S1). Because the exon-skipping discovery pipeline does not support paired-end reads, only the 5 ′ -end of the read was used for all paired-end data sets (Livesay et al 2013;Schwer et al 2014). An earlier version of our intron discovery pipeline supported paired-end data sets; thus, both ends of the paired-end reads from Rhind et al (2011) were used for novel intron discovery.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Publicly available data sets were downloaded from GEO, SRA, or ArrayExpress repositories (accessions indicated in Supplemental Table S1). Because the exon-skipping discovery pipeline does not support paired-end reads, only the 5 ′ -end of the read was used for all paired-end data sets (Livesay et al 2013;Schwer et al 2014). An earlier version of our intron discovery pipeline supported paired-end data sets; thus, both ends of the paired-end reads from Rhind et al (2011) were used for novel intron discovery.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Induction of the phosphate-regulated genes is strictly dependent on transcription factor Pho7 (Henry et al 2011;Carter-O'Connell et al 2012). Repression of pho1 under phosphate replete conditions is itself an active process involving protein kinases Csk1 and Cdk9 and the phosphorylation of the carboxyl-terminal domain (CTD) of the Rpb1 subunit of RNA polymerase II (Pol2) (Carter-O'Connell et al 2012;Schwer et al 2014Schwer et al , 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phosphorylation of the CTD Tyr1, Ser2, Thr4, Ser5, and Ser7 residues inscribes a dynamic "CTD code" that orchestrates transcription, cotranscriptional RNA processing, and chromatin modifications (Schwer and Shuman 2011;Schwer et al 2012;Corden 2013;Eick and Geyer 2013;Doamekpor et al 2014;Mbogning et al 2015). Deletion of Csk1, missense mutations of the Cdk9 T-loop threonine, and alanine mutations of Pol2 CTD phospho-sites Ser5, Pro6, or Ser7 cause derepression of pho1 in phosphate replete cells (Carter-O'Connell et al 2012;Schwer et al 2014Schwer et al , 2015. In contrast, CTD mutations T4A and S7E, and inactivation of CTD phosphatase Ssu72, hyper-repress pho1 in phosphate replete cells .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upregulation of the expression of these genes during phosphate starvation depends on the transcription factor Pho7 (Henry et al 2011;Carter-O'Connell et al 2012), a member of the zinc binuclear cluster family of fungal DNA-binding transcription regulators (MacPherson et al 2006). The protein kinase Csk1 is a negative regulator of the phosphate response, as judged by the fact that pho1 expression is constitutively turned on in csk1Δ cells under phosphate-replete conditions (Henry et al 2011;Carter-O'Connell et al 2012;Schwer et al 2014). Csk1 is a CDK-activating kinase with several physiological targets, including the kinases Cdc2, Mcs6, and Cdk9 (Saiz and Fisher 2002;Pei et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%