2013
DOI: 10.1134/s106235901302012x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual identification of Amur leopards (Panthera pardus orientalis) using molecular-genetic methods and the population size estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean observed heterozygosity was 0.33, slightly lower than the expected heterozygosity and ranged from 0.04 to 0.75 ( Table 2 ). The expected heterozygosity in previous studies of 0.45 reported by Rozhnov et al [ 43 ] and 0.43 reported by Sugimoto et al [ 37 ] were also low, indicating the genetic vulnerability of the Amur leopard population. The result of the Wilcoxon test revealed no significant sign of a recent bottleneck (probability of one tail for H excess = 0.29150), although the Garza–Williamson index was less than 0.68 (mean = 0.4205 ± 0.17018), which implies a historic bottleneck event in the population [ 35 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The mean observed heterozygosity was 0.33, slightly lower than the expected heterozygosity and ranged from 0.04 to 0.75 ( Table 2 ). The expected heterozygosity in previous studies of 0.45 reported by Rozhnov et al [ 43 ] and 0.43 reported by Sugimoto et al [ 37 ] were also low, indicating the genetic vulnerability of the Amur leopard population. The result of the Wilcoxon test revealed no significant sign of a recent bottleneck (probability of one tail for H excess = 0.29150), although the Garza–Williamson index was less than 0.68 (mean = 0.4205 ± 0.17018), which implies a historic bottleneck event in the population [ 35 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…We performed genotyping four times, after which the genotype was determined by standard peak map. Meanwhile, correspondingly, the consensus genotype was determined, which is found a homozygote with a minimum of three times and two times for a heterozygote (Rozhnov et al, ). For the samples that failed to obtain consistent genotype results, we added another three amplifications.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until the two subpopulation of Amur leopard in northern of Primorski Krai disappeared by 1985, the one of the present study becomes only single subpopulation in the planet (Pikunov and Korkishko, 1985) [3]. The subpopulation reside in the region occupying approximately 7,000 km 2 , it is around the borders of the Northeast of China, the extreme southwest of the Primorskii krai (the Far East of Russian), and the extreme north of North Korea [2] [3] [4]. Although the numbers of it is increases in recently [1], however, the Amur leopards on the whole are as few as about 60 individuals [2].As the Amur leopard still is most threatened in a stochastic procession of extinction [5], it is currently classified as Critically…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Along with the attention paid on the Amur leopard increasing, a few researches are taken on the ecology with population, potential supporting prey, habitat situation, distribution, and genetic diversity [6] [1] [7] [4], however, little research on the disease is made. As the diseases have lethality adverse to protection of the wild Amur tiger [8], it reminds us that the situation of Amur leopard is likely with Amur tiger or even worse because it is a small, single population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%